Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

12.5K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
12.5K
Upsampling01:22

Upsampling

300
Managing signal sampling rates is essential in digital signal processing to maintain signal integrity. A decimated signal, characterized by a reduced frequency range due to its lower sampling rate, can be upsampled by inserting zeros between each sample. This upsampling process expands the original spectrum and introduces repeated spectral replicas at intervals dictated by the new Nyquist frequency. To refine this zero-inserted sequence, it is passed through a lowpass filter with a cutoff...
300
Sampling Methods: Overview01:06

Sampling Methods: Overview

485
A sample refers to a smaller subset representative of a larger population. In analytical chemistry, studying or analyzing an entire population is often impractical or impossible. Therefore, samples are used to draw inferences and generalize the whole population. The sampling method selects individuals or items from a population to create a sample. Standard sampling methods include random, judgemental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling. 
In analytical chemistry, the choice of...
485
Sampling Distribution01:12

Sampling Distribution

13.6K
Given simple random samples of size n from a given population with a measured characteristic such as mean, proportion, or standard deviation for each sample, the probability distribution of all the measured characteristics is called a sampling distribution. How much the statistic varies from one sample to another is known as the sampling variability of a statistic. You typically measure the sampling variability of a statistic by its standard error. The standard error of the mean is an example...
13.6K
Sampling Theorem01:15

Sampling Theorem

732
In signal processing, the analysis of continuous-time signals, denoted as x(t), often involves sampling techniques to convert these signals into discrete-time signals. This process is essential for digital representation and manipulation. A critical component in sampling is the train of impulses, characterized by the sampling interval and the sampling frequency. The relationship between these parameters and the original signal's properties dictates the success of the sampling process.
732
Classification of Signals01:30

Classification of Signals

784
In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...
784

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of certified reference materials of medium crude oil for water content with enhanced stability.

Talanta·2026
Same author

Enhancing knowledge graph recommendations through deep reinforcement learning.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Time-varying effect of venous hemodynamics in intensive care via neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a prospective' single-center' self-controlled study.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

A self-supervised group recommendation model with conformity awareness.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Recommendation of deep reinforcement learning based on value function considering error reduction.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Controllable mechanochromic responses in fluorescent elastomers <i>via</i> perylene bisimide aggregation engineering.

Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.6K

A Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique Based on Gaussian Mixture Model Filtering for Imbalanced Data

Zhaozhao Xu, Derong Shen, Yue Kou

    IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
    |August 19, 2022
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    A new method, Gaussian mixture model filtering-synthetic minority oversampling technique (GMF-SMOTE), addresses data imbalance in machine learning. GMF-SMOTE effectively filters noisy and boundary samples, improving classifier performance on imbalanced datasets.

    More Related Videos

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
    03:37

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

    Published on: March 1, 2024

    862
    Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
    08:27

    Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

    Published on: July 27, 2021

    3.8K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    7.6K
    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
    03:37

    Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

    Published on: March 1, 2024

    862
    Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
    08:27

    Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

    Published on: July 27, 2021

    3.8K

    Area of Science:

    • Machine Learning
    • Data Science
    • Artificial Intelligence

    Background:

    • Data imbalance is a prevalent challenge in machine learning classification.
    • Minority class samples are often underrepresented, hindering classifier learning.
    • Existing Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) can introduce noisy or boundary samples.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a novel oversampling technique, Gaussian mixture model filtering-synthetic minority oversampling technique (GMF-SMOTE).
    • To address limitations of traditional SMOTE by filtering noisy and boundary samples.
    • To enhance classifier performance on imbalanced datasets.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized Gaussian mixture model (GMM) with the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for data clustering.
    • Applied EM-based filtering to remove noisy and boundary samples within GMM-defined subclasses.
    • Implemented dynamic oversampling ratios for both majority and minority classes.

    Main Results:

    • GMF-SMOTE demonstrated superior performance over traditional oversampling methods on 20 UCI datasets.
    • Achieved high average sensitivity (97.49%) and specificity (97.02%) for Random Forest (RF) models.
    • Reported significantly improved G-mean (97.32%) and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) (94.80%) compared to existing algorithms.

    Conclusions:

    • GMF-SMOTE effectively mitigates issues of noisy and boundary samples inherent in standard SMOTE.
    • The proposed method significantly enhances the performance of classifiers on imbalanced datasets.
    • Statistical tests confirm the significant superiority of GMF-SMOTE over traditional oversampling techniques.