Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Global Climate Change01:50

Global Climate Change

24.7K
Throughout its ~4.5 billion year history, the Earth has experienced periods of warming and cooling. However, the current drastic increase in global temperatures is well outside of the Earth’s cyclic norms, and evidence for human-caused global climate change is compelling. Paleoclimatology, the study of ancient climate conditions, provides ample evidence for human-caused global climate change by comparing recent conditions with those in the past.
24.7K
What is Climate?01:16

What is Climate?

18.8K
Climate refers to the prevailing weather conditions in a specific area over an extended period. As the saying goes, “Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” Climate is influenced by geographic factors, such as latitude, terrain, and proximity to bodies of water.
18.8K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.5K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.5K
Routes of Persuasion02:20

Routes of Persuasion

64.8K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
64.8K
Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

39.3K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
39.3K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

146
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
146

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The erosion of trust is contributing to science denial.

Current opinion in psychology·2025
Same author

Practice testing enhances learning but not attitude change from persuasive texts.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Combatting negative bias: a mental contrasting and implementation intentions online intervention to increase help-seeking among individuals with elevated depressive symptomatology.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Socio-Scientific Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparing In-person and Virtual Science Learning Using Model-Evidence Link Diagrams.

Journal of science education and technology·2023
Same author

Corrigendum: Flattening the COVID-19 curve: Emotions mediate the effects of a persuasive message on preventive action.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Flattening the COVID-19 curve: Emotions mediate the effects of a persuasive message on preventive action.

Frontiers in psychology·2022
Same journal

Adverse and positive childhood experiences in relation to adolescent mental health: sequential indirect associations.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Personality profiles and usage experience are associated with trust and dependence on generative AI: a latent profile analysis.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: Promoting replicability: empowering method and applied researchers in driving reliable results.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The mediating roles of the challenge appraisal in the relationship between the coach-athlete relationship and adolescent athletes' burnout.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Unpacking GenAI-enabled deep learning engagement: role perceptions, human-GenAI synergy strategies, and underlying mechanisms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Violence exposure and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: the mediating role of moral disengagement.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

1.0K

Optimizing climate change communication: Context Comparison Model method.

Viviane Seyranian1, Doug Lombardi2, Gale M Sinatra3

  • 1Psychology Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Pomona, CA, United States.

Frontiers in Psychology
|August 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The Context Comparison Model (CCM) shows how source and target group influence climate change beliefs. Ingroup sources swayed attitudes, while outgroup sources increased perceived plausibility, validating the CCM.

Keywords:
attitude changeclimate changecontext comparison modelminority influencepolitical partyscience communicationsocial identity

More Related Videos

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 31, 2025

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions
06:10

Using Generative Art to Convey Past and Future Climate Transitions

Published on: March 31, 2023

1.0K
Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

8.1K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Science Communication
  • Environmental Communication

Background:

  • Persuasive communication effectiveness depends on context.
  • The Context Comparison Model (CCM) identifies source, target, and task variables for consideration.
  • Understanding these variables is crucial for effective science communication, particularly on complex issues like climate change.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the Context Comparison Model (CCM) in the domain of global climate change communication.
  • To examine how source characteristics (ingroup/outgroup, minority/majority) influence attitudes and perceived plausibility of climate change.
  • To assess the predictive accuracy of the CCM regarding persuasive effects in a politically polarized context.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving American participants with varying political affiliations (Republican, Democrat, Independent/Other).
  • Participants were exposed to information on climate change and a mitigation policy proposal.
  • Random assignment to one of four source conditions: ingroup minority, ingroup majority, outgroup minority, or outgroup majority.

Main Results:

  • Pretest data indicated stronger climate change attitudes among Democrats compared to Republicans.
  • Participants' attitudes were more influenced by ingroup sources, with larger effects for ingroup minorities.
  • Perceived plausibility of climate change was higher when influenced by an outgroup source, especially outgroup majorities.

Conclusions:

  • The Context Comparison Model (CCM) accurately predicted the observed persuasive effects.
  • Ingroup identification plays a significant role in attitude formation regarding climate change.
  • Different source characteristics influence subjective attitudes versus the perceived plausibility of scientific information, with implications for tailored science communication strategies.