Fracture load of zirconia crowns based on preparation and cement type

Limited research has been published evaluating the failure of zirconia crowns with less retentive tooth preparations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of axial wall height (AWH) and cement type on the fracture load of cubic phase-containing zirconia crowns. Standardized crown preparations with an AWH of 0, 2, or 4 mm (n = 10) were made in 90 extracted human maxillary third molars. The preparations were scanned, and crown restorations were designed. Cubic phase-containing zirconia crowns were milled and cemented with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement, a self-adhesive resin cement, or an adhesive resin cement. The specimens were subjected to thermocycling and cyclic loading. Each crown specimen was positioned in a universal testing machine so that the long axis of the tooth was at a 60° angle to the testing fixture and loaded until failure using a stainless steel rod resting on the buccal incline of the palatal cusp. Data were found to have a nonnormal distribution and were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Statistically significant differences in the median fracture loads of the groups were found based on both AWH and cement type (P < 0.05). Regardless of cement type, the median fracture loads were significantly lower in the 0-mm AWH groups than in the 2-mm and 4-mm AWH groups, which were not significantly different from each other. Compared to the other cement types, adhesive resin cement resulted in a significantly greater median fracture load when the AWH was 0 mm. The use of an adhesive resin cement with a cubic phase-containing zirconia crown may provide greater fracture resistance for preparations with minimal AWH.