Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 31, 2025

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Comparing sagittal heights calculated using corneal parameters and those measured with profilometry.
Javier Rojas Viñuela1, David P Piñero2, Mercedes Burgos Martínez3
1Natural Optics Balaguer, 25600 Balaguer, Lleida, Spain.
Calculating the anterior eye's sagittal height (OC-SAG) using corneal parameters showed significant differences compared to profilometry measurements, particularly for larger diameters. These discrepancies impact soft contact lens fitting.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Optometry
Background:
- Accurate measurement of ocular surface geometry is crucial for custom contact lens fitting.
- The sagittal height of the anterior eye (OC-SAG) is a key parameter for designing and fitting contact lenses.
- Discrepancies in OC-SAG calculation can lead to suboptimal lens fit and patient discomfort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the anterior eye's sagittal height (OC-SAG) calculated from corneal parameters with profilometry measurements.
- To evaluate the accuracy of different calculation methods for OC-SAG in soft contact lens wearers.
- To determine the clinical significance of differences in OC-SAG measurements for contact lens fitting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 70 soft contact lens wearer eyes using the ESP profilometer.
- Calculation of OC-SAG using corneal parameters (mean k-values, eccentricity, corneal radius) at various chord diameters.
- Comparison of calculated OC-SAG with profilometrically measured OC-SAG, including analysis with and without a shape factor.
- Evaluation of a custom soft lens manufacturer's formula for OC-SAG calculation.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant differences were found between calculated and measured OC-SAG, increasing with larger chord diameters (p < 0.001).
- Including a shape factor reduced differences, but they remained significant for larger diameters.
- Using the inner best-fit sphere for OC-SAG estimation showed minimal differences for specific chord diameters (14 and 14.5 mm).
- Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.53 to 0.90, indicating moderate to strong agreement depending on the method and diameter.
Conclusions:
- Calculated OC-SAG using corneal parameters shows statistically and clinically significant differences compared to profilometry, especially at larger chord diameters.
- These differences have implications for the accuracy of contact lens fitting.
- Further research is needed to address the impact of these OC-SAG discrepancies on contact lens fitting outcomes.
More Related Videos
07:51Full-Field Optical Coherence Microscopy for Histology-Like Analysis of Stromal Features in Corneal Grafts
Published on: October 21, 2022
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024