Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025
Coordinate Mapping of Hyolaryngeal Mechanics in Swallowing
Published on: May 6, 2014
Intra- and Inter-observer Agreement of High Resolution Antroduodenal Manometry in Pediatric Patients Among Single
Francesco Valitutti1,2, Keith Lindley1, Efstratios Saliakellis1
1From the Division of Neurogastroenterology & Motility, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Objectives:
Studies in adults have suggested that high-resolution technology increases the diagnostic yield of antroduodenal manometry (ADM). However, there is no study comparing high-resolution with low-resolution ADM recordings as well as comparing the 2 types of high-resolution display [conventional line plot (CLP) and pressure topographic plots (PTP)]. We hypothesized that high-resolution ADM is a superior diagnostic modality with higher inter-observer and intra-observer agreement compared with low-resolution recordings.
Methods:
Twenty-four anonymized ADM studies were blindly analyzed by 3 experienced pediatric neurogastroenterologists. All studies had been performed using a low-compliance water-perfused system with a 20-channels catheter. Data were displayed as CLP, as both high-resolution and low-resolution, and PTP in different sessions with at least 6-week interval. Accuracy was evaluated using previous established diagnosis and specific pre-prandial and post-prandial manometric patterns. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreements were calculated.
Results:
Analysis with high-resolution CLP revealed a substantial inter-observer agreement among the 3 observers regarding the diagnosis (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.832; average pairwise percentage agreement: 88.9%). Conversely, PTP and low-resolution CLP showed poor agreement for diagnoses (Krippendorff's alpha: 0.600; average pairwise percentage agreement: 75.3%; Krippendorff's alpha: 0.390; average pairwise percentage agreement: 60.2%, respectively). For the intra-observer agreement, Krippendorff's alpha ranges were 0.891-1 for CLP and 0.19393-0.34621 for PTP.
Conclusions:
Our study demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy for high-resolution ADM compared to the low-resolution recordings. However, although it is well established for other motility investigations, PTP is not yet reliable in assessing foregut motor patterns. Advanced and more sophisticated software are clearly required for analyzing PTP display.
