Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Conducting Hyperscanning Experiments with Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: January 19, 2019
Application of low-complexity generalized coherence factor to in vivo data
Masanori Hisatsu1,2, Shohei Mori3, Mototaka Arakawa4,3
1FUJIFILM Healthcare Corporation, 3-1-1 Higashikoigakubo, Kokubunji, Tokyo, 185-0014, Japan. masanori.hisatsu.uc@fujifilm.com.
The generalized coherence factor (GCF) beamforming method, GCFbin, significantly reduces computational complexity and improves artifact reduction compared to GCF. This novel approach offers enhanced contrast performance in medical imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical imaging
- Ultrasound beamforming
- Signal processing
Background:
- Generalized coherence factor (GCF) beamforming enhances contrast-to-noise ratio and reduces sidelobe artifacts.
- Previous methods include GCFreal (without analytic signals) and GCFbin (binarizing signals).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the computational complexity reduction and contrast performance of GCFreal and GCFbin on in vivo data.
- To investigate the impact of signal characteristics on contrast performance differences between methods.
Main Methods:
- Acquired channel RF data from human liver and gallbladder.
- Analyzed signals and power spectra at various observation points to understand contrast performance variations.
- Compared GCF, GCFreal, and GCFbin performance.
Main Results:
- GCF and GCFreal yielded similar values.
- GCFbin showed significant differences from GCF when signals from different channels originated from inside and outside the focal point.
- Binarization altered amplitudes of coherent and incoherent signals, causing GCFbin discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- GCFbin substantially reduces computational complexity but differs from GCF due to signal binarization.
- GCFbin demonstrated superior artifact reduction compared to GCF, attributed to the elimination of amplitude information.
- GCFbin represents a novel, efficient coherence factor with distinct characteristics.
More Related Videos
08:25Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
Published on: May 19, 2016
05:33How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
Published on: September 8, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Compacting Factor test
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Extraction: Partition and Distribution Coefficients
For extracting a solute from an aqueous phase into an...
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...