Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

The Representativeness Heuristic

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Cultural evolution by revealed preferences - from status signals to alien porn.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Discovery tools: How powerful new scientific methods and instruments emerge and catalyze innovation.

PNAS nexus·2026

Same author

Generics in science communication: Misaligned interpretations across laypeople, scientists, and large language models.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026

Same author

HEALTHCOMM SIMULATOR: virtual simulation tool for training communication skills.

Computers in biology and medicine·2025

Same author

Generalization bias in large language model summarization of scientific research.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same author

Science of science: A multidisciplinary field studying science.

Heliyon·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Generalization Bias in Science.

Uwe Peters^1,2, Alexander Krauss^3,4, Oliver Braganza^5,2

¹Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence, University of Cambridge.

Cognitive Science

|August 31, 2022

Summary

Scientists often unintentionally overgeneralize research findings due to an automatic generalization bias. This cognitive bias leads to unwarranted conclusions and contributes to the science replication crisis, requiring debiasing strategies.

Keywords:

Bounded cognition Generalization bias Overgeneralization Replication crisis Scientific induction

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 30, 2025

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research

Published on: August 4, 2023

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Modeling the Size Spectrum for Macroinvertebrates and Fishes in Stream Ecosystems

Published on: July 30, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Scientific Methodology

Background:

Scientific induction is assumed to be a voluntary process of generalization.
Researchers typically assess data generalizability before drawing conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

To challenge the voluntary inference view of scientific induction.
To propose a novel account of scientific induction involving a default generalization bias.

Main Methods:

Integration of findings from cognitive sciences.
Analysis of existing research on scientific induction.

Main Results:

Scientific induction involves an automatic generalization bias by default.
This bias frequently leads to unintentional overgeneralization of findings without sufficient evidence.
Unwarranted, overgeneralized conclusions are a common outcome.

Conclusions:

The default generalization bias in scientific induction requires revising current thinking.
This bias is an overlooked cause of the scientific replication crisis.
Cognitive debiasing strategies are needed alongside other interventions to combat overgeneralization.