Incidence and Predictors of Adverse Events Among Initially Stable ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients
Jaihoon Amon1, Graham C Wong2,3, Terry Lee4,5
1Division of Cardiology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.
Insights
Stable ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) rarely experience adverse events. Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease independently predicts these events, suggesting routine cardiac intensive care unit admission may not be necessary.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) were historically for managing arrhythmias post-myocardial infarction (MI).
- Current practice often involves routine CICU admission for stable ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), irrespective of risk.
- This practice may lead to unnecessary resource utilization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify factors associated with in-hospital adverse events in hemodynamically stable STEMI patients after pPCI.
- To evaluate the necessity of routine CICU admission for these patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2101 STEMI patients who received pPCI (April 2012 - November 2019).
- Exclusion of patients with initial cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure, leaving 1770 stable patients.
- Multivariable logistic regression to determine predictors of adverse events (cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, stroke, re-infarction, death).
Main Results:
- 5.3% of stable STEMI patients experienced at least one adverse event.
- Univariable predictors included older age, female sex, prior stroke, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation.
- Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (creatinine clearance <44 mL/min) independently predicted adverse events (OR 2.24 [95% CI, 1.12-4.48]).
Conclusions:
- Most initially stable STEMI patients treated with pPCI do not develop in-hospital adverse events.
- Moderate to severe CKD is a significant independent predictor of adverse events.
- Findings suggest that routine CICU admission for all STEMI patients post-pPCI may not be warranted.
Abstract:
Background Cardiac intensive care units were originally created in the prerevascularization era for the early recognition of ventricular arrhythmias following a myocardial infarction. Many patients with stable ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are still routinely triaged to cardiac intensive care units after a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), independent of clinical risk or the provision of critical care therapies. The aim of this study was to determine factors associated with in-hospital adverse events in a hemodynamically stable, postreperfusion population of patients with STEMI. Methods and Results Between April 2012 and November 2019, 2101 consecutive patients with STEMI who received pPCI in the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority were evaluated. Patients were stratified into those with and without subsequent adverse events, which were defined as cardiogenic shock, in-hospital cardiac arrest, stroke, re-infarction, and death. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of adverse events. After excluding patients presenting with cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure, the final analysis cohort comprised 1770 stable patients with STEMI who had received pPCI. A total of 94 (5.3%) patients developed at least one adverse event: cardiogenic shock 55 (3.1%), in-hospital cardiac arrest 42 (2.4%), death 28 (1.6%), stroke 21 (1.2%), and re-infarction 5 (0.3%). Univariable predictors of adverse events were older age, female sex, prior stroke, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation. There was no significant difference in reperfusion times between those with and without adverse events. Following multivariable adjustment, moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (creatinine clearance <44 mL/min; 13% of cohort) was associated with adverse events (odds ratio 2.24 [95% CI, 1.12-4.48]) independent of reperfusion time, age, sex, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and prior myocardial infarction/PCI/coronary artery bypass grafting. Conclusions Only 1 in 20 initially stable patients with STEMI receiving pPCI developed an in-hospital adverse event. Moderate to severe chronic kidney disease independently predicted the risk of future adverse events. These results indicate that the majority of patients with STEMI who receive pPCI may not require routine admission to a cardiac intensive care unit following reperfusion.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
