Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Decoding time from space: A review of the complication clock and its representation of temporal experience.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Self-reported problems in medication self-management in older polymedicated patients in general practice.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

A quantitative account of how limited information sharing undermines comprehensive literature syntheses.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Mobilizing effort in complex motor tasks: Try-harder instructions in deceptive actions" [Psychology of Sport and Exercise 84 (2026) 103083].

Psychology of sport and exercise·2026
Same author

Optimizing action separation and integration through moderate practice.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Guiding gaze via gaze: Effect anticipation during intentional saccadic gaze leading.

Psychological research·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K

On doing multi-act arithmetic: A multitrait-multimethod approach of performance dimensions in integrated

Frank Schumann1, Michael B Steinborn2, Hagen C Flehmig3

  • 1Mittweida University of Applied Sciences, Mittweida, Germany.

Frontiers in Psychology
|September 5, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study evaluated test-retest reliability for multitasking using speeded mental arithmetic. Speed-adjusted variability measures showed excellent reliability and discriminant validity, offering valuable insights for clinical neuropsychology.

Keywords:
cognitive controlconcentrationreliabilitysustained attentionvigilance

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
13:57

Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective

Published on: July 1, 2015

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Neuropsychology

Background:

  • Assessing test-retest reliability in multitasking is crucial for understanding cognitive performance stability.
  • The multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) approach provides a framework for evaluating psychometric properties.
  • Speeded mental arithmetic tasks, particularly Düker-type, allow for the analysis of integrated multi-step processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate the test-retest reliability of performance in speeded multiple-act mental arithmetic.
  • To evaluate the psychometric properties of different scoring methodologies, focusing on response speed variability.
  • To compare ability-related differences in measurement precision, simulating patient populations for clinical relevance.

Main Methods:

  • Employed the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) approach to assess reliability and validity.
  • Conducted two experiments using Düker-type speeded multiple-act mental arithmetic tasks (addition/verification and addition/comparison).
  • Analyzed test-retest reliability, between-measures correlational structure, and stability, including practice effects.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability for both standard and response speed variability measures.
  • Absolute response speed variability was highly correlated with average speed, suggesting redundant information.
  • Speed-adjusted (relativized) variability showed discriminant validity and was unaffected by test-retest practice.

Conclusions:

  • Speed-adjusted variability is a reliable and valid measure in multitasking research, providing unique information beyond average speed.
  • This measure is particularly useful in repeated testing scenarios due to its stability against practice effects.
  • Findings have significant implications for measurement precision in clinical neuropsychology and cognitive assessment.