Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

A Rodent Model of The Ross Operation: Syngeneic Pulmonary Artery Graft Implantation in A Systemic Position
Published on: April 1, 2022
Surgical valvotomy versus balloon dilatation for children with severe aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review
Huzeifa Elhedai1, Salma Saeed S Mohamed2, Hamid Idriss3
1Department of Cardiology, Birmingham Women's & Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Insights
Surgical aortic valvotomy (SAV) and balloon aortic dilatation (BAD) show similar survival rates for severe aortic stenosis. SAV offers better gradient reduction and lower aortic regurgitation post-procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis (AS) necessitates intervention to improve patient outcomes.
- Surgical aortic valvotomy (SAV) and balloon aortic dilatation (BAD) are primary treatment options.
- Comparative effectiveness of SAV versus BAD for severe AS requires detailed evaluation.
Approach:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.
- Eleven studies comprising 1733 patients (743 SAV, 990 BAD) were analyzed.
- Outcomes including mortality, need for aortic valve replacement, hemodynamic changes, and valve function were assessed.
Key Points:
- No significant differences were observed in early, late, or total mortality between SAV and BAD.
- Freedom from aortic valve replacement was comparable between the two intervention groups.
- SAV demonstrated a significantly greater reduction in aortic systolic gradient and a lower rate of postprocedural aortic regurgitation compared to BAD.
Conclusions:
- Both SAV and BAD are viable options for severe aortic stenosis regarding survival.
- SAV provides superior hemodynamic improvement and better valve function post-intervention.
- These findings suggest SAV may be preferred when significant gradient reduction and prevention of aortic regurgitation are key goals.
Abstract:
Aim: To evaluate outcomes of interventions for severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), whether it is done by surgical aortic valvotomy (SAV) or balloon aortic dilatation (BAD). Results: Eleven studies with total number of 1733 patients; 743 patients had SAV, while 990 patients received BAD. There was no significant difference in early mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96, p = 0.86), late mortality (OR: 1.28, p = 0.25), total mortality (OR: 1.10, p = 0.56), and freedom from aortic valve replacement (OR: 1.00, p = 1.00). Reduction of aortic systolic gradient was significantly higher in the SAV group (OR: 2.24, p = 0.00001), and postprocedural AR rate was lower in SAV group (OR: 0.21, p = 0.00001). Conclusion: SAV is associated with better reduction of aortic systolic gradient and lesser post procedural AR which reduce when compared with BAD.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis IV: Nursing Management

