Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2025

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Distinct binding mode of BAFF antagonist antibodies belimumab and tabalumab, analyzed by computer simulation
Yaxin Jiang1, Jian Sun1, Jing Wei2
1Tianjin Key Laboratory for Modern Drug Delivery & High-Efficiency, School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, No. 92 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin, 300072, People's Republic of China.
Abstract:
B cell-activating factor (BAFF) can bind with specific receptors to activate signalling pathways associated with the B cell activation. Belimumab and tabalumab are anti-BAFF (B cell depleting) monoclonal antibodies, with therapeutic efficacy demonstrated for the treatment of autoimmune disorders, while belimumab was approved by FDA in 2011 as a targeted therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and exhibited better clinical outcome than tabalumab. In this investigation, the combination modes of BAFF-belimumab and BAFF-tabalumab complexes were simulated in silico to better understand the reason for the comparative inhibitory difference between belimumab and tabalumab. The structures of belimumab and tabalumab were constructed through homology modelling. The combination mode of BAFF-belimumab complex was analyzed by molecular dynamics simulation, while that of BAFF-tabalumab complex was analyzed by protein-protein docking following the molecular dynamics simulation. Both belimumab and tabalumab were bound with BAFF at the same hydrophobic center to which the natural receptors of BAFF bind as well. Belimumab heavy chain components I51, F54, K58, D100, D101, L102, L103, and P105 and R27, Y30, K49, and S65 of belimumab light chain contribute to the BAFF-belimumab interaction mainly via hydrogen bonds, salt bridges, and hydrophobic interactions. More importantly, belimumab could bind to L83 of BAFF and produce steric hindrance with the adjacent BAFF trimers, while tabalumab could not. Therefore, our results indicated that belimumab has a better clinical outcome compared with tabalumab mainly because belimumab could bind to L83 of BAFF and interfere the formation of a BAFF 60-mer, besides mediating inhibition of the interaction of BAFF with its receptors.
More Related Videos
15:27Determination of High-affinity Antibody-antigen Binding Kinetics Using Four Biosensor Platforms
Published on: April 17, 2017
10:17Creating Highly Specific Chemically Induced Protein Dimerization Systems by Stepwise Phage Selection of a Combinatorial Single-Domain Antibody Library
Published on: January 14, 2020
Related Concept Videos
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Antibody Actions
Neutralization
Antibodies can bind to pathogens, preventing them from infecting host cells. This process...