Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.8K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.8K
Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

506
Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
506
Perception01:28

Perception

547
Perception is a fundamental psychological process that enables individuals to organize, interpret, and consciously experience sensory information. This process is crucial for understanding and interacting with the world around us. It includes both bottom-up and top-down processing, each playing a distinct role in how we perceive our environment.
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
547
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

849
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
849
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

207
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
207
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.8K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing cognition and quality of life in people with epilepsy: A feasibility study for mild and marked cognitive impairment.

Epilepsy & behavior : E&B·2026
Same author

A single perceptual comparison is sufficient, but not necessary, to induce lasting memory distortion.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Memory Reactivation Levels Remain Unaffected by Anticipated Interference.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Attraction and repulsion in perception and working memory as complementary outcomes of learning.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same author

Towards the use of functional near-infrared spectroscopy as an assessment tool in disorders of consciousness.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Neural Reconstruction in Disorders of Consciousness: Prospects and Emerging Challenges.

The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry·2026
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K

Perceptual comparisons modulate memory biases induced by new visual inputs.

Joseph M Saito1, Matthew Kolisnyk2, Keisuke Fukuda3,4

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G3, Canada.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|September 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Explicitly comparing visual stimuli amplifies memory biases. This research shows that actively judging similarity, not just stimulus overlap, causally influences visual working memory (VWM) biases.

Keywords:
Memory distortionPerceptual interferenceVisual working memory

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

11.0K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual working memory (VWM) is susceptible to biases from new perceptual information.
  • These biases are often linked to physical similarity between VWM content and new stimuli.
  • Prior research suggests explicit similarity comparisons may further modulate these memory biases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether explicit perceptual comparisons causally modulate visual working memory (VWM) biases.
  • To compare memory bias sizes after explicit comparisons versus ignoring or maintaining new stimuli in VWM.
  • To determine if similarity judgments, not just stimulus overlap, influence VWM biases.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed tasks involving visual working memory and explicit perceptual comparisons.
  • Memory biases were measured by comparing VWM reports under different conditions: explicit comparison, ignoring new input, and co-maintaining new input.
  • Analysis correlated bias amplification with participants' similarity judgments.

Main Results:

  • Larger attraction biases were observed following explicit perceptual comparisons compared to other conditions.
  • Memory biases were amplified when participants judged stimuli as similar to VWM content, but not when judged dissimilar.
  • These effects persisted after controlling for physical stimulus similarity and baseline memory precision.

Conclusions:

  • Explicit perceptual comparisons play a causal role in modulating visual working memory biases.
  • The act of comparing and judging similarity significantly influences how memory is distorted by new information.
  • Findings highlight the active, rather than purely passive, nature of VWM updating and bias formation.