Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer - routine procedure or targeted patient selection?

Insights

Laparoscopic repair of peptic ulcer perforation may be suitable for low-risk patients, though it showed higher complication rates. The Boey score accurately predicts mortality risk for surgical approach selection.

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Clinical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Peptic ulcer perforation is a serious gastrointestinal complication with high mortality.
  • Surgical repair via laparoscopy or laparotomy is the standard treatment.
  • Accurate risk assessment is crucial for selecting the optimal surgical approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair for acute peptic ulcer perforation.
  • To evaluate the predictive accuracy of the Boey scoring system in the Czech population for surgical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 60 patients undergoing laparoscopic or open repair of perforated peptic ulcer (2017-2021).
  • Data collection on postoperative morbidity, complication rates (mild and severe), and mortality.
  • Assessment of the correlation between Boey score and patient outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Laparoscopic repair was performed in 43.3%, open repair in 56.7% of patients.
  • Overall postoperative morbidity was 70.0%, with higher rates of mild and severe complications in the laparoscopic group (26.9% vs 20.6% and 19.2% vs 14.7%, respectively).
  • Despite higher complication rates, laparoscopy had lower mortality (15.4% vs 41.2%), aligning with the Boey score's risk prediction.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic repair is a viable option for low-risk peptic ulcer perforation patients.
  • The Boey score accurately predicts mortality risk, guiding the choice between laparoscopic and open surgical approaches.
  • While laparoscopy may have increased complication incidence, open repair is associated with higher mortality, particularly in patients with worse initial clinical status.
Abstract