Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

83
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
83
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

100
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
100
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

363
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
363
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.4K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interhospital variation in Medicare spending for infections after coronary artery bypass grafting and surgical aortic valve replacement.

JTCVS open·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of interventions to promote couples-based HIV testing and family health during pregnancy and postpartum in Kenya: a multicentre, couples-based, randomised controlled trial.

The lancet. HIV·2026
Same author

High-Risk Substance and Polysubstance Use Among Elective Surgery Patients: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2026
Same author

Adaptive intervention strategies for malaria vector control in western Kenya: a cluster, sequential, multiple-assignment, randomised, open-label trial.

The Lancet. Global health·2026
Same author

Feasibility Pilot Trial for the Trajectories of Recovery after Intravenous Propofol versus Inhaled Volatile Anesthesia (THRIVE) Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anesthesiology·2026
Same author

Family history of type 2 diabetes delays development of type 1 diabetes in TEDDY children with islet autoimmunity.

Diabetologia·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Power prior models for estimating response rates in a small n, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial.

Yan-Cheng Chao1, Thomas M Braun1, Roy N Tamura2

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, 51329School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|September 9, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces power prior models for small sample, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (snSMART). These methods efficiently estimate treatment response rates using data from both trial stages.

Keywords:
Bayesian joint stage modelBhattacharyya’s overlap measureFisher’s exact testclinical trialsmodified power prior

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 29, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.0K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Small sample, sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials (snSMART) are efficient designs for adaptive treatment selection.
  • Estimating treatment response rates in snSMARTs using all available data is crucial for small sample sizes.
  • Existing methods may not fully leverage data from both stages of an snSMART.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel power prior models for analyzing snSMART data.
  • To compare the performance of power prior models against the Bayesian joint stage model (BJSM).
  • To identify optimal statistical approaches for estimating response rates in snSMARTs.

Main Methods:

  • Application of existing power prior models to snSMART data.
  • Development of new extensions of power prior models.
  • Simulation studies comparing power prior methods and BJSM based on bias and efficiency.

Main Results:

  • Power prior models effectively incorporate data from both stages of an snSMART.
  • Fisher's Exact Test and Bhattacharyya's overlap measure demonstrate competitive or superior performance to BJSM.
  • Performance comparisons highlight the strengths of specific power prior approaches under different scenarios.

Conclusions:

  • Power prior models offer a robust framework for analyzing snSMART data, particularly in small sample settings.
  • Fisher's Exact Test and Bhattacharyya's overlap measure are recommended for estimating snSMART response rates.
  • The study provides guidance on selecting the most appropriate method based on study characteristics.