Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual assessment for frontal sinus radiographic identifications: Documenting accuracy and exploring the effects of experience.

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Personal identification using frontal sinus coding methods: The effect of mixed image modality comparisons.

Journal of forensic sciences·2024
Same author

Human maxillary sinus size, shape, and surface area: Implications for structural and functional hypotheses.

American journal of biological anthropology·2023
Same author

Investigating the relationship between infraorbital canal morphology and maxillary sinus size.

Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)·2022
Same author

Ontogenetic patterns in human frontal sinus shape: A longitudinal study using elliptical Fourier analysis.

Journal of anatomy·2022
Same author

Muscular anatomy of the forelimb of tiger (Panthera tigris).

Journal of anatomy·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

16.9K

Technical Modifications for the Application of the Total Difference Method for Frontal Sinus Comparison.

Jessica L Campbell1, Lauren N Butaric1

  • 1Department of Anatomy, Des Moines University, 3200 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, IA 50312, USA.

Biology
|September 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study validates the Total Difference Method (TDM) for frontal sinus identification. A semi-automated method significantly improved accuracy and efficiency compared to manual techniques.

Keywords:
ImageJforensic anthropologyfrontal sinuspersonal identificationradiographic comparisonshape outline analysis

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K
Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
09:30

Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment

Published on: May 23, 2025

739

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
06:13

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation

Published on: June 20, 2018

16.9K
Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.2K
Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
09:30

Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment

Published on: May 23, 2025

739

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biometrics

Background:

  • Frontal sinus analysis has been used for personal identification since the 1920s.
  • Validation of existing frontal sinus-based identification methods is infrequent.
  • The Total Difference Method (TDM) is one such technique requiring rigorous assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the Total Difference Method (TDM) for frontal sinus-based personal identification.
  • To compare the accuracy, repeatability, and efficiency of three assessment modes: Freehand, Overlay, and Semi-Auto.
  • To evaluate observer error and the impact of method familiarity.

Main Methods:

  • Posterior-anterior radiographs of 10 adults were analyzed.
  • Three assessment modes were employed: Freehand, Overlay, and Semi-Auto (using overlay and macro).
  • Evaluated metrics included time, accuracy of line lengths, midline assessment, and angle placement.

Main Results:

  • The Semi-Auto Mode demonstrated significantly fewer errors in angle placement and line length accuracy compared to Freehand and Overlay Modes.
  • The Semi-Auto Mode was substantially faster (46.1% faster than Freehand, 34% faster than Overlay).
  • Observer error was identified, with accuracy and efficiency improvements in the Semi-Auto Mode observed after user familiarization.

Conclusions:

  • The Total Difference Method (TDM) technique is reliably repeatable.
  • A semi-automated macro significantly enhances the accuracy and efficiency of TDM analysis.
  • User familiarity with the method and macro procedures is crucial for optimal results.