Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Burs, teeth and hand instruments.

K S Lester

    Australian Dental Journal
    |June 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Scanning electron microscopy revealed surface deficiencies in dental cavity preparations using conventional instruments. Optimized rotary and hand instruments improve cavity surface preparation for better clinical outcomes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The psychologist's role in the Garrison mission of combat stress control units.

    Military medicine·2000
    Same author

    An evaluation by scanning electron microscopy of small dental cutting instruments through use and cleaning.

    Australian dental journal·1990
    Same author

    Procerberus enamel: a missing link.

    Scanning microscopy·1989
    Same author

    Crystallite orientation discontinuities and the evolution of mammalian enamel--or, when is a prism?

    Scanning microscopy·1989
    Same author

    A custom-designed computer network for a dental clinical school.

    Australian dental journal·1989
    Same author

    Ultrastructural variation in enamel of Australian marsupials.

    Scanning microscopy·1989
    Same journal

    Perspectives of Oral Health Practitioners Working in Rural New South Wales: Culture, Wellbeing and Workforce Sustainability.

    Australian dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Misquoting of Scientific Literature.

    Australian dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Surface Physical and Mechanical Properties of Short Fibre Reinforced Composite Resins in Direct Restorative Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

    Australian dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Marginal and Internal Fit, Surface Roughness and Fracture Resistance of Hybrid Dental Crown Materials Fabricated With Milling and 3D-Printing Systems: An In Vitro Study.

    Australian dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    The Australian and New Zealand Dental Implant Registry: Regulatory Requirements and Registry Development.

    Australian dental journal·2026
    Same journal

    Patterns of Surgical Prophylaxis Prescribing for Dentoalveolar Procedures in Australian Hospitals: 2016-2022.

    Australian dental journal·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Dental Materials Science
    • Biomaterials Engineering
    • Microscopy Techniques

    Background:

    • Conventional dental cutting instruments often leave unprepared surfaces in cavity preparations.
    • Surface quality is critical for the longevity and success of dental restorations.
    • Microscopic evaluation is essential for assessing the integrity of prepared tooth surfaces.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the surface characteristics of cavity preparations made with different instruments.
    • To identify methods for achieving superior surface preparation in dentistry.
    • To understand the impact of instrument type and manipulation on enamel margin quality.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to examine cavity preparation surfaces.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared surfaces prepared with conventional cutting instruments versus specialized rotary and hand instruments.
  • Investigated the effect of instrument rotation direction on enamel margin quality.

    • Main Results:

    • SEM revealed significant surface deficiencies with conventional cutting instruments.
    • Appropriately shaped tungsten rotary instruments and sharp hand instruments with a scraping action yielded better surface preparation.
    • The direction of cutting tool rotation demonstrably influenced the quality of the enamel margin.

    Conclusions:

    • Specialized instruments and techniques can overcome limitations of conventional cavity preparation.
    • SEM is a valuable tool for assessing surface quality, but should not be the sole determinant of clinical success.
    • Optimizing cavity preparation surfaces is crucial for enhancing the performance of dental restorations.