Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Propensity-matched comparison of right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy for isolated mitral valve repair
Sabet W Hashim1, Sean R McMahon1, Irena K Vaitkeviciute1
1Hartford Health Care Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Background:
A right mini-thoracotomy (RT) versus median sternotomy (MS) approach for isolated mitral valve (MV) repair has been associated with less postoperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and faster functional recovery, but with consistently longer cross-clamp time and higher operative costs.
Methods:
We assessed the impact of a modified operative technique on outcomes in 158 RT versus 129 MS patients treated with myxomatous MV repair from 2016 through 2021. Propensity matching based upon the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score was used to compare 108 patients in each cohort.
Results:
Propensity-matched RT patients had reductions in total ventilation time (P=0.025), postoperative atrial fibrillation (P=0.019), and hospital length of stay (P<0.001). RT and MS patients had similar cross-clamp times (66.4±13.7 vs 64.8±16.0 minutes, P=0.414), with less overall leaflet resection (32.4% vs 57.4%, P<0.001) and fewer Gore-Tex NeoChords implanted per patient (1.7±0.7 vs 2.1±1.0, P=0.028) in the RT group. The two cohorts did not differ with respect to 30-day major surgical complications. No patient died and there was no difference between the two groups with respect to freedom from re-operation (98.2% vs 98.2%, P=0.800) at a mean follow-up of 21.4±18.5 months. Direct total hospital costs were lower for the RT group (P=0.018), with reductions in postoperative charges offsetting increased operating room costs.
Conclusions:
In this single-center study, the RT compared to the MS approach for myxomatous MV repair resulted in less postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital length of stay, with similar cross-clamp time, reduced total hospital costs, and comparable intermediate outcomes.
Insights
Right mini-thoracotomy (RT) offers reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stays for mitral valve (MV) repair compared to median sternotomy (MS). This approach also lowers costs with similar cross-clamp times and comparable intermediate outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Thoracic Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Mitral valve (MV) repair via right mini-thoracotomy (RT) is associated with benefits like reduced postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stays compared to median sternotomy (MS).
- However, RT has historically shown longer cross-clamp times and higher operative costs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a modified operative technique on outcomes for isolated myxomatous mitral valve repair using RT versus MS.
- To compare postoperative morbidity, cross-clamp time, hospital stay, costs, and intermediate outcomes between the two surgical approaches.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study comparing 158 patients undergoing RT and 129 patients undergoing MS for myxomatous MV repair (2016-2021).
- Propensity score matching based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score was used to create comparable cohorts of 108 patients each.
- Outcomes assessed included ventilation time, atrial fibrillation, hospital length of stay, cross-clamp time, leaflet resection, Gore-Tex NeoChords implantation, major complications, re-operation rates, and total hospital costs.
Main Results:
- Propensity-matched RT patients demonstrated significantly reduced ventilation time (P=0.025), postoperative atrial fibrillation (P=0.019), and hospital length of stay (P<0.001).
- Cross-clamp times were similar between RT and MS groups (66.4±13.7 vs 64.8±16.0 minutes, P=0.414).
- The RT group showed less leaflet resection (32.4% vs 57.4%, P<0.001) and fewer Gore-Tex NeoChords implanted (1.7±0.7 vs 2.1±1.0, P=0.028), with lower direct total hospital costs (P=0.018).
- No significant differences were observed in 30-day major surgical complications or freedom from re-operation at mean follow-up (98.2% vs 98.2%, P=0.800).
Conclusions:
- The modified RT approach for myxomatous MV repair is associated with less postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital stays compared to MS.
- This approach achieves similar cross-clamp times, reduced total hospital costs, and comparable intermediate outcomes.
- RT presents a viable alternative to MS for myxomatous MV repair, offering improved efficiency and patient recovery.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

