Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

A Simplified Stepwise Approach to Echo Guidance during Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair
Published on: October 16, 2021
Early and Intermediate Outcomes of Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspiration to Treat Mitral Annular Calcification
Wendy Jin1,2, Sabet W Hashim1, Raymond G Mckay1
1Cardiac Surgery, Hartford Healthcare Heart and Vascular Institute, Hartford, CT, 06106, United States.
Objectives:
Severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) carries an increased risk of perioperative complications in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery and may be considered a prohibitive surgical risk. Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspiration (CUSA) has been reported as a method for controlled debridement of severe MAC during mitral valve surgery; however, experience in the literature is limited.
Methods:
We assessed 30-day and intermediate-term outcomes in 67 consecutive patients (mean age: 72 [SD 9] years; female sex: 65.7% [44/67]) with severe MAC who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement for mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation using CUSA from March 2021 through December 2024. Operations included isolated mitral valve replacement (41.8% [28/67]), isolated mitral valve repair (4.5% [3/67]), mitral and aortic valve replacement (37.3% [25/67]), mitral valve replacement with coronary bypass (6.0% [4/67]), and mitral and aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass (10.4% [7/67]). Intermediate survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results:
Mortality rate was 6.0% (4/67), stroke was 3.0% (2/67), and new postoperative atrial fibrillation was 29.0% (20/67). There were no atrioventricular groove ruptures. At a median echocardiographic follow-up time of 361 days (interquartile range [IQR] 112, 671), moderate paravalvular leak occurred in 3.0% (1/67). Mid-term all-cause mortality was 9.0% at a mean follow-up time of 42.5 (95% CI, 39.0, 46.0) months.
Conclusions:
The use of CUSA to debride severe mitral annular calcification in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery is associated with acceptable short-term morbidity and mortality and durable intermediate-term results. This technique allows surgical intervention in patients who may otherwise be deemed prohibitive surgical risk.
Insights
Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspiration (CUSA) effectively debrides severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) during valve surgery. This method offers acceptable short-term outcomes and durable intermediate-term results for high-risk patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Valve Surgery
- Mitral Valve Disease
Background:
- Severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) increases perioperative risks in mitral valve surgery.
- MAC can be a prohibitive risk factor for surgical intervention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspiration (CUSA) for debriding severe MAC.
- To assess short-term and intermediate-term outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery with CUSA-assisted MAC debridement.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 67 consecutive patients with severe MAC underwent mitral valve repair or replacement using CUSA.
- Surgical procedures included valve replacement, repair, and combined procedures with or without coronary bypass.
- Outcomes assessed included 30-day morbidity/mortality and intermediate-term survival via Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Main Results:
- 30-day mortality was 6.0%, stroke rate was 3.0%, and new atrial fibrillation occurred in 29.0%.
- No atrioventricular groove ruptures were reported.
- Intermediate-term all-cause mortality was 9.0% at a mean follow-up of 42.5 months, with 3.0% moderate paravalvular leak.
Conclusions:
- CUSA debridement of severe MAC during mitral valve surgery is associated with acceptable short-term morbidity and mortality.
- The technique demonstrates durable intermediate-term results.
- CUSA facilitates surgical intervention for patients with prohibitive surgical risk due to severe MAC.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

