Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Intramucosal Inoculation of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells in Mice for Tumor Immune Profiling and Treatment Response Assessment
Published on: April 22, 2019
Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell
Sungjune Kim1, Evan Wuthrick2, Dukagjin Blakaj3
1Department of Radiation Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA; Department of Immunology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Background:
Merkel cell carcinoma is among the most aggressive and lethal of primary skin cancers, with a high rate of distant metastasis. Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy is currently standard of care for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. We assessed treatment with combined nivolumab plus ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma as a first-line therapy or following previous treatment with anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monotherapy.
Methods:
In this randomised, open label, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned adults from two cancer sites in the USA (one in Florida and one in Ohio) to group A (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab) or group B (combined nivolumab and ipilimumab plus SBRT) in a 1:1 ratio. Eligible patients were aged at least 18 years with histologically proven advanced stage (unresectable, recurrent, or stage IV) Merkel cell carcinoma, a minimum of two tumour lesions measureable by CT, MRI or clinical exam, and tumour tissue available for exploratory biomarker analysis. Patients were stratified by previous immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) status to receive nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks (group A) or the same schedule of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with the addition of SBRT to at least one tumour site (24 Gy in three fractions at week 2; group B). Patients had to have at least two measurable sites of disease so one non-irradiated site could be followed for response. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. ORR was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response or partial response per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Response was assessed every 12 weeks. Safety was assessed in all patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03071406.
Findings:
50 patients (25 in both group A and group B) were enrolled between March 14, 2017, and Dec 21, 2021, including 24 ICI-naive patients (13 [52%] of 25 group A patients and 11 [44%] of 25 group B patients]) and 26 patients with previous ICI (12 [48%] of 25 group A patients and 14 [56%] of 25 group B patients]). One patient in group B did not receive SBRT due to concerns about excess toxicity. Median follow-up was 14·6 months (IQR 9·1-26·5). Two patients in group B were excluded from the analysis of the primary endpoint because the target lesions were irradiated and so the patients were deemed non-evaluable. Of the ICI-naive patients, 22 (100%) of 22 (95% CI 82-100) had an objective response, including nine (41% [95% CI 21-63]) with complete response. Of the patients who had previously had ICI exposure, eight (31%) of 26 patients (95% CI 15-52) had an objective response and four (15% [5-36]) had a complete response. No significant differences in ORR were observed between groups A (18 [72%] of 25 patients) and B (12 [52%] of 23 patients; p=0·26). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 10 (40%) of 25 patients in group A and 8 (32%) of 25 patients in group B.
Interpretation:
First-line combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma showed a high ORR with durable responses and an expected safety profile. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab also showed clinical benefit in patients with previous anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 treatment. Addition of SBRT did not improve efficacy of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab represents a new first-line and salvage therapeutic option for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma.
Funding:
Bristol Myers Squibb Rare Population Malignancy Program.
Insights
First-line combined nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrated high objective response rates in advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Stereotactic body radiotherapy did not improve efficacy, establishing this combination as a new therapeutic option.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunotherapy
- Dermatology
Background:
- Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive skin cancer with high metastatic potential.
- Anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapy is the current standard for advanced MCC.
- Novel therapeutic strategies are needed to improve outcomes for patients with advanced MCC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the efficacy and safety of combined nivolumab and ipilimumab, with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma.
- To evaluate this combination as a first-line therapy or following prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment.
- To determine if SBRT addition improves outcomes in advanced MCC treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial involving 50 patients with advanced MCC across two US cancer sites.
- Patients were assigned 1:1 to receive either combined nivolumab and ipilimumab (Group A) or combined nivolumab, ipilimumab, plus SBRT (Group B).
- The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed per immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRCIST).
Main Results:
- In immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-naive patients, 100% achieved an objective response (ORR), with 41% experiencing a complete response.
- Among patients with prior ICI exposure, the ORR was 31%, with 15% achieving a complete response.
- No significant difference in ORR was observed between Group A (72%) and Group B (52%; p=0.26). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 40% of Group A and 32% of Group B.
Conclusions:
- Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab demonstrates high ORR and durable responses in first-line advanced MCC.
- This combination shows clinical benefit in patients previously treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents.
- The addition of SBRT did not enhance the efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced MCC.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...

