Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025
Biotribological Testing and Analysis of Articular Cartilage Sliding against Metal for Implants
Published on: May 14, 2020
Ceramic Femoral Heads Exhibit Lower Wear Rates Compared to Cobalt Chrome: A Meta-Analysis
Kevin C Mertz1, JaeWon Yang2, Brian C Chung1
1Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Background:
Wear between the femoral head and acetabular liners continues to limit the longevity of total hip arthroplasty implants despite advances in implant materials. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare linear wear rates of cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and fourth-generation ceramic femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners.
Methods:
A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted to identify all studies between 2003 and 2020 that examined in vivo wear rates of either fourth-generation ceramics or CoCr femoral heads on XLPE liners. Studies were analyzed in a weighted means analysis of wear rates and a random effects meta-analysis.
Results:
A total of 36 studies met inclusion criteria (1,657 CoCr and 659 ceramic patients). The pooled, weighted mean wear rate was 0.063 mm/year (standard deviation [SD]: 0.061, confidence interval [CI]: 0.049-0.077) for CoCr and 0.047 mm/year (SD: 0.057, CI: 0.033-0.062; P < .01) for ceramic (P < .01). A meta-analysis of 4 studies directly comparing ceramic and CoCr found that CoCr heads demonstrated 0.029 mm/year more wear than ceramic heads (95% CI: 0.026-0.059, P = .306). Mean wear for 32-mm heads was significantly higher for ceramic (P < .01), while mean wear for 36-mm heads was significantly higher for CoCr (P < .01).
Conclusion:
Fourth-generation ceramic femoral heads were found to have significantly lower wear rates than CoCr heads. Unlike previous studies, this meta-analysis included only in vivo studies and those with the same generation of highly XLPE liners.
