First-principles investigation of in-plane anisotropies in XYTe4 monolayers with X = Hf, Zr, Ti and Y = Si, Ge
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
Degao Xu1, Jianing Tan1, Huamin Hu1
1Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Matter Microstructure and Function of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China. gangouy@hunnu.edu.cn.
Abstract:
In-plane anisotropic materials can introduce additional degrees of freedom while tuning their physical properties, which expand the range of opportunities for designing novel semiconductor devices and exploring distinct applications. In this work, we investigate the in-plane anisotropic electronic, elastic, transport and piezoelectric properties in a family of isostructural telluride XYTe4 (X = Hf, Zr and Ti, Y = Si and Ge) monolayers based on first-principles calculations. Six types of structures are verified to harbor direct bandgaps at the Γ point ranging between 0.98 and 1.36 eV. The orientation-dependent in-plane elastic stiffness of XYTe4 reveals the anisotropic and ultrasoft nature. Superior dielectric constants and giant switching effects are found in TiGeTe4 monolayers because of giant in-plane anisotropy. Strikingly, the piezoelectric coefficients of XSiTe4 differ by an order of magnitude along the two main directions. The strong in-plane anisotropic elastic properties of XYTe4 monolayers together with outstanding piezoelectric responses show that these structures can compete with that of transition metal dichalcogenides for applications in the field of flexible electronic devices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Predicting Molecular Geometry

