Related Experiment Videos
Factorial dimensions of the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist: replication and validation within a kindergarten
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
|June 1, 1987
Summary
The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC) shows promise for assessing young children. Teacher ratings revealed distinct behavior dimensions, supporting its use in early childhood behavior assessment.
Area of Science:
- Child Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Psychometric Assessment
Background:
- The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC) is a tool for assessing behavioral issues in children.
- Understanding the factor structure of the RBPC is crucial for its accurate application in diverse populations.
- Previous research has established the utility of the RBPC in various age groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the factor structure of the RBPC in a large sample of kindergarten children.
- To assess the consistency of the RBPC's factor structure across gender and risk status.
- To evaluate the divergent validity of RBPC dimensions with external criteria.
Main Methods:
- A large sample of suburban kindergarten children was utilized.
- Teacher ratings on the RBPC were analyzed using principal component analysis.
- Divergent validity was assessed using alternative behavior ratings, cognitive functioning, and academic achievement measures.
Main Results:
- Teacher-rated dimensions closely replicated previous findings and revealed a new 'Unmotivated-Isolated' factor.
- The factor structure remained consistent across gender and risk status subgroups.
- Evidence for divergent validity was found for Conduct Disorder and Attention Problems-Immaturity dimensions.
- Parent-rated components showed less clear validation, with modest parent-teacher agreement.
Conclusions:
- The RBPC demonstrates potential for assessing preschool-aged children.
- Distinct externalizing dimensions, such as inattentive versus conduct-disordered behavior, are identifiable at this age.
- Further research may refine parent-rated scales and explore cross-informant agreement.