Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

10:20
Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
Published on: March 12, 2013
13.5K
Risk effects cascade up to an obligate scavenger
Paula L Perrig1,2, Sergio A Lambertucci1, Emiliano Donadio3
1Grupo de Investigaciones en Biología de la Conservación, INIBIOMA (Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET), Bariloche, Argentina.
Ecology
|September 18, 2022
Summary
Andean condors avoid risky foraging sites near puma hunting grounds. They strategically select safe carrion locations, demonstrating risk management crucial for obligate scavengers.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Behavioral Ecology
- Wildlife Conservation
Background:
- Predation risk significantly impacts prey populations, but its effects on scavengers are less understood.
- Obligate scavengers, like Andean condors, face heightened vulnerability while foraging on carrion, often shared with apex predators.
- Understanding how scavengers perceive and respond to risk is vital for conservation efforts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how predation risk influences the foraging behavior of Andean condors (Vultur gryphus).
- To determine if condors adjust their habitat selection and carrion exploitation strategies in response to puma (Puma concolor) predation risk.
- To explore the role of landscape features in mediating risk for obligate scavengers.
Main Methods:
- Satellite telemetry tracked nine Andean condors to analyze flight paths and habitat selection.
- Camera traps monitored 41 natural carcasses and 25 experimental carrion stations to observe foraging behavior.
- Habitat variables, including vegetation height and slope, were analyzed in relation to condor presence and puma kill sites.
Main Results:
- Condors actively searched for carrion in areas with a high likelihood of puma kills.
- Condors avoided exploiting carrion located in areas with tall vegetation and steep slopes, which are preferred puma stalking habitats.
- Risk management by condors appeared to occur primarily through pre-landing site assessment, prioritizing safe foraging locations.
Conclusions:
- Andean condors exhibit sophisticated risk-assessment behaviors, avoiding foraging sites associated with potential puma threats.
- This study highlights that predation risk effects extend beyond direct predator-prey interactions, significantly impacting obligate scavengers.
- Conservation strategies for Andean condors should consider the landscape's risk structure and the availability of safe foraging opportunities.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
18.5K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
18.5K
Trophic Levels
31.4K
All organisms in an ecosystem occupy a trophic level in the food chain. The lowest level consists of primary producers, which synthesize their food from either solar or chemical energy. Each subsequent level obtains energy from the levels below. Detritivores can occupy any of the levels above primary producers.
31.4K
Optimal Foraging
12.4K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
12.4K
Habitat Fragmentation
17.8K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
17.8K
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
19.1K
Elements are the smallest units of matter that cannot be broken down further by chemical processes. There are 118 known elements, but not all of these are naturally occurring, and only a few of them are essential for life. Living matter is composed primarily of carbon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and oxygen, with smaller amounts of other elements like calcium, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur. Other elements are also necessary for life but only in trace amounts.
Periodic Table Provides Information...
Periodic Table Provides Information...
19.1K
Symbiosis
29.9K
Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
29.9K

