Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Individualized and generalized models for predicting observer performance on liver metastasis detection using CT
Parvathy Sudhir Pillai1, David R Holmes2, Rickey Carter3
1Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiology, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
Abstract:
Purpose: Radiologists exhibit wide inter-reader variability in diagnostic performance. This work aimed to compare different feature sets to predict if a radiologist could detect a specific liver metastasis in contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images and to evaluate possible improvements in individualizing models to specific radiologists. Approach: Abdominal CT images from 102 patients, including 124 liver metastases in 51 patients were reconstructed at five different kernels/doses using projection domain noise insertion to yield 510 image sets. Ten abdominal radiologists marked suspected metastases in all image sets. Potentially salient features predicting metastasis detection were identified in three ways: (i) logistic regression based on human annotations (semantic), (ii) random forests based on radiologic features (radiomic), and (iii) inductive derivation using convolutional neural networks (CNN). For all three approaches, generalized models were trained using metastases that were detected by at least two radiologists. Conversely, individualized models were trained using each radiologist's markings to predict reader-specific metastases detection. Results: In fivefold cross-validation, both individualized and generalized CNN models achieved higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) than semantic and radiomic models in predicting reader-specific metastases detection ability ( ). The individualized CNN with an AUC of mean (SD) 0.85(0.04) outperformed the generalized one [ , ]. The individualized semantic [ ] and radiomic models [ ] outperformed the respective generalized versions [semantic , ; radiomic , ]. Conclusions: Individualized models slightly outperformed generalized models for all three feature sets. Inductive CNNs were better at predicting metastases detection than semantic or radiomic features. Generalized models have implementation advantages when individualized data are unavailable.
More Related Videos
11:43Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones
Published on: November 30, 2016
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018