Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Studying Chronic Exposure of Mice to Ultraviolet B Radiation
Published on: August 19, 2025
Protective Barriers and Radiant Exposure Delivered from Light-curing Units
P O Boeira1, J G Alves2, Ctw Meereis3
1Peterson Oliveira Boeira, MsC, DDS, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.
Objective:
To evaluate the influence of different protective barriers as a function of the photoactivation distances on the radiant exposure of several light-curing units (LCU). The influence of the protective barriers on the degree of conversion of an adhesive resin was also evaluated.
Methods:
Five LCUs were evaluated: Valo Cordless-used in standard mode (Ultradent, South Jordan, USA); Radii-cal-used in continuous mode (SDI, Bayswater, AU); Emitter D-used in continuous mode (Schuster, Santa Maria, BR); Bluephase N-used in high-intensity mode (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, LI); and Rainbow Curing Light-used in continuous mode (Axdent, Guangdong, CN). For each LCU, radiant exposure was measured with a spectrometer (MARC Resin Calibrator) using three different protective barriers (low-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, or Radii-cal barrier sleeves) and five photoactivation distances (0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 mm). The degree of conversion of an adhesive resin (Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, USA) was measured through Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. The translucency parameter of protective barriers was measured with a spectrophotometer. For all statistical tests, a significance level of α = 0.05 was set.
Results:
For all LCUs tested, radiant exposure was found to be significantly influenced by both protective barriers and curing distance (p≤0.001). In general terms, all the protective barriers significantly decreased the radiant exposure. Radii-cal barrier sleeves were the protective barrier that most decreased the radiant exposure. Irrespective of the protective barrier used, none of the LCU equipment reached the required minimum radiant exposure of 16 J/cm2 at 10 mm of curing distance. The degree of conversion was not effected by either LCU or a protective barrier (p≥0.211).
Conclusions:
Protective barriers and photoactivation distance reduced the radiant exposure emitted by different LCUs.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Physical Methods for Controlling Microbial Growth: Radiation and Filtration
Personal Protective Equipment
Standard Precaution
Hand hygiene is the most crucial means to prevent the transmission of disease. Employers are legally required to provide their workers with personal protective equipment (PPE) to minimize exposure or contact with...
PPE Use in Healthcare Settings I: Donning
Mutations
Chromosomal Alterations Are Large-Scale Mutations
While point mutations are changes in a single nucleotide in...

