Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

An Integrated Workflow of Identification and Quantification on FDR Control-Based Untargeted Metabolome
Published on: September 20, 2022
Group-walk: a rigorous approach to group-wise false discovery rate analysis by target-decoy competition
Jack Freestone1, Temana Short1, William Stafford Noble2
1School of Mathematics and Statistics F07, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, Australia.
Motivation:
Target-decoy competition (TDC) is a commonly used method for false discovery rate (FDR) control in the analysis of tandem mass spectrometry data. This type of competition-based FDR control has recently gained significant popularity in other fields after Barber and Candès laid its theoretical foundation in a more general setting that included the feature selection problem. In both cases, the competition is based on a head-to-head comparison between an (observed) target score and a corresponding decoy (knockoff) score. However, the effectiveness of TDC depends on whether the data are homogeneous, which is often not the case: in many settings, the data consist of groups with different score profiles or different proportions of true nulls. In such cases, applying TDC while ignoring the group structure often yields imbalanced lists of discoveries, where some groups might include relatively many false discoveries and other groups include relatively very few. On the other hand, as we show, the alternative approach of applying TDC separately to each group does not rigorously control the FDR.
Results:
We developed Group-walk, a procedure that controls the FDR in the target-decoy/knockoff setting while taking into account a given group structure. Group-walk is derived from the recently developed AdaPT-a general framework for controlling the FDR with side-information. We show using simulated and real datasets that when the data naturally divide into groups with different characteristics Group-walk can deliver consistent power gains that in some cases are substantial. These groupings include the precursor charge state (4% more discovered peptides at 1% FDR threshold), the peptide length (3.6% increase) and the mass difference due to modifications (26% increase).
Availability And Implementation:
Group-walk is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/groupwalk/index.html.
Supplementary Information:
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Fisher's Exact Test
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

