Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Ex Vivo Porcine Experimental Model for Studying and Teaching Lung Mechanics
Published on: April 19, 2024
Pediatric Simulation of Intrinsic PEEP and Patient-Ventilator Trigger Asynchrony During Mechanical Ventilation
Amanda J Nickel1, Howard B Panitch2, Joseph M McDonough3
1Department of Respiratory Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. nickelaj@chop.edu.
Insights
Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation increases with expiratory resistance. This can cause patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) by creating an inspiratory load that respiratory muscles must overcome.
Area of Science:
- Mechanical Ventilation
- Respiratory Physiology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) arises from insufficient expiratory time during mechanical ventilation, leading to air trapping.
- Causes include increased expiratory resistance (RE), rapid breathing rates, and high inspiratory to expiratory time ratios (TI/TE).
- Intrinsic PEEP can increase work of breathing and cause patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between expiratory resistance and intrinsic PEEP.
- To evaluate the impact of intrinsic PEEP on trigger asynchrony during mechanical ventilation.
- To determine if increased respiratory muscle pressure (Pmus) can mitigate trigger asynchrony.
Main Methods:
- A passive lung model (Servo lung model, ASL 5000) was used to demonstrate how elevated RE increases intrinsic PEEP.
- An active lung model was employed to study the effects of RE and intrinsic PEEP on trigger asynchrony.
- The study assessed if increasing Pmus could reduce trigger asynchrony.
Main Results:
- Intrinsic PEEP significantly increased with rising RE (r = 0.97, P = .006).
- Multivariate logistic regression revealed that both RE and negative Pmus levels significantly affect trigger asynchrony (P < .001).
Conclusions:
- A passive model illustrates increasing intrinsic PEEP with RE.
- An active model demonstrates how intrinsic PEEP creates an inspiratory load, increasing trigger asynchrony.
- The findings suggest that increasing ventilator PEEP to match intrinsic PEEP may improve trigger asynchrony by reducing RE.
Background:
Intrinsic PEEP during mechanical ventilation occurs when there is insufficient time for expiration to functional residual capacity before the next inspiration, resulting in air trapping. Increased expiratory resistance (RE), too rapid of a patient or ventilator breathing rate, or a longer inspiratory to expiratory time ratio (TI/TE) can all be causes of intrinsic PEEP. Intrinsic PEEP can result in increased work of breathing and patient-ventilator asynchrony (PVA) during patient-triggered breaths. We hypothesized that the difference between intrinsic PEEP and ventilator PEEP acts as an inspiratory load resulting in trigger asynchrony that needs to be overcome by increased respiratory muscle pressure (Pmus).
Methods:
Using a Servo lung model (ASL 5000) and LTV 1200 ventilator in pressure control mode, we developed a passive model demonstrating how elevated RE increases intrinsic PEEP above ventilator PEEP. We also developed an active model investigating the effects of RE and intrinsic PEEP on trigger asynchrony (expressed as percentage of patient-initiated breaths that failed to trigger). We then studied if trigger asynchrony could be reduced by increased Pmus.
Results:
Intrinsic PEEP increased significantly with increasing RE (r = 0.97, P = .006). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both RE and negative Pmus levels affect trigger asynchrony (P < .001).
Conclusions:
A passive lung model describes the development of increasing intrinsic PEEP with increasing RE at a given ventilator breathing rate. An active lung model shows how this can lead to trigger asynchrony since the Pmus needed to trigger a breath is greater with increased RE, as the inspiratory muscles must overcome intrinsic PEEP. This model will lend itself to the study of intrinsic PEEP engendered by a higher ventilator breathing rate, as well as higher TI/TE, and will be useful in ventilator simulation scenarios of PVA. The model also suggests that increasing ventilator PEEP to match intrinsic PEEP can improve trigger asynchrony through a reduction in RE.
Related Concept Videos
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Pulmonary Ventilation: Inhalation
Boyle's law becomes particularly pertinent when examining respiratory...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management

