Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2025

Monitoring of Nanodrug Accumulation in Murine Breast Cancer Metastases
Published on: August 23, 2024
Accrual-Monitoring Practices for Various Disease Trials among AACI Member Cancer Centers
Zachary T Elliott1, Zachary Goldberg1, Ramez Philips1
1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19144, USA.
Abstract:
Progress in the management of rare diseases, including rare cancers, is dependent upon clinical trials; however, as many as 32% of rare-disease trials go uncompleted or unpublished due to insufficient accrual. Monitoring practices may differ between institutions. We sought to survey the regulatory standards for various trial types among major U.S. cancer centers. A 10-question survey was designed using Qualtrics assessment software. The survey was sent via email to an internal server of member institutions of the Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI). Of 103 AACI centers, 31% completed the survey (n = 32). Respondents differed in their definitions of a rare disease, minimum expectations for rare tumor studies, and frequency of accrual monitoring by their institutional Protocol Review and Monitoring Committee. Seventy-three percent of respondents did not close trials based on low accrual. Strategies to optimize accrual included investigator incentives for high accrual and penalties for low accrual in 37% and 13% of respondents, respectively.
Insights
Clinical trials for rare diseases face challenges with patient enrollment, impacting completion rates. Practices for monitoring trial accrual and rare disease definitions vary significantly among U.S. cancer centers.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trial Management
- Rare Diseases
Background:
- Clinical trials are crucial for advancing rare disease and rare cancer management.
- Insufficient patient accrual (up to 32%) leads to trial incompletion and non-publication.
- Monitoring practices for clinical trials can vary across institutions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey regulatory standards for different trial types at major U.S. cancer centers.
- To understand institutional approaches to rare disease trial accrual and monitoring.
Main Methods:
- A 10-question survey was administered using Qualtrics.
- The survey targeted member institutions of the Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI).
- Data were collected from 32 out of 103 AACI centers (31% response rate).
Main Results:
- Significant differences were observed in rare disease definitions and expectations for rare tumor studies.
- Accrual monitoring frequency by institutional Protocol Review and Monitoring Committees varied.
- Most respondents (73%) did not discontinue trials solely due to low patient accrual.
Conclusions:
- Institutional practices regarding rare disease definitions and trial monitoring are inconsistent.
- Strategies like investigator incentives (37%) and penalties (13%) are employed to optimize accrual.
- Further standardization may be needed to improve rare disease clinical trial success rates.
More Related Videos
14:14Adaptation of Semiautomated Circulating Tumor Cell CTC Assays for Clinical and Preclinical Research Applications
Published on: February 28, 2014
05:36Comparing Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Model Established in Mouse Kidney and on Chicken Chorioallantoic Membrane
Published on: February 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Standards of Care II
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...