Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Molecular Biomarker Testing for Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Optimal Treatments for NSCLC Patients Harboring Primary or Acquired MET Amplification
Dantong Sun1, Junyan Tao2, Weihua Yan3
1National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Abstract:
Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring MET mutations, MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been proven to achieve a good response. However, the relative efficacy of different therapeutics in primary NSCLC patients with MET amplification and the treatment options for patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKIs remain unclear. Methods: In total, 33 patients harboring primary MET amplification and 9 patients harboring acquired MET alterations identified by next-generation sequencing were enrolled. A retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy of different therapeutics. In addition, studies reporting various treatments for patients harboring MET alterations were included in the meta-analysis. Results: In our cohort of patients harboring primary MET amplification, crizotinib displayed better efficacy than immunotherapy and chemotherapy, as demonstrated both in first-line (P = .0378) and second-line treatment regimens (P = .0181). The disease control rates for crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy were 81.8%, 72.7%, and 63.6%, respectively. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time after immunotherapy in patients harboring MET amplification and high programed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (>50%) was only 77.5 days. The meta-analysis revealed that the median PFS times after crizotinib and immunotherapy were 4.57 and 2.94 months, respectively. In patients harboring acquired MET amplification, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab had superior efficacy (310.0 days vs 73.5 days, P = .0360) compared with MET-TKIs ± EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Immunotherapy showed a low response in patients harboring MET alterations, even those with concurrent high PD-L1 expression. MET-TKIs might be an optional treatment with worth-expecting efficacy. However, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab could benefit the subpopulation of patients harboring acquired MET amplification after the failure of EGFR-TKIs.
Insights
Crizotinib shows superior efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with primary MET amplification compared to immunotherapy or chemotherapy. For acquired MET amplification post-EGFR-TKI failure, chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is more effective than MET-TKIs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Genetics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- MET amplification is a driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for MET-mutated NSCLC.
- Efficacy of treatments for primary MET amplification and acquired MET alterations post-EGFR-TKI failure remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of different therapeutics in NSCLC patients with primary MET amplification.
- To evaluate treatment options for NSCLC patients with acquired MET alterations after EGFR-TKI failure.
- To analyze treatment outcomes through a meta-analysis of existing studies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 33 patients with primary MET amplification and 9 with acquired MET alterations.
- Comparison of crizotinib, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy efficacy in primary MET amplification.
- Meta-analysis of studies on MET-altered NSCLC treatments.
- Evaluation of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab versus MET-TKIs for acquired MET amplification.
Main Results:
- Crizotinib demonstrated superior efficacy over immunotherapy and chemotherapy in primary MET amplification (first-line P=.0378, second-line P=.0181).
- Disease control rates: crizotinib (81.8%), immunotherapy (72.7%), chemotherapy (63.6%).
- Immunotherapy showed limited efficacy in MET-amplified NSCLC, even with high PD-L1 expression (median PFS 77.5 days).
- Meta-analysis: median PFS for crizotinib (4.57 months) vs. immunotherapy (2.94 months).
- Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab significantly outperformed MET-TKIs in acquired MET amplification (310.0 days vs. 73.5 days, P=.0360).
Conclusions:
- Immunotherapy has a low response rate in MET-altered NSCLC, irrespective of PD-L1 status.
- MET-TKIs represent a potentially effective treatment option for MET-amplified NSCLC.
- Chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab is a beneficial strategy for patients with acquired MET amplification following EGFR-TKI treatment failure.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...