Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Complete transcatheter versus surgical approach to aortic stenosis with coronary artery disease: A systematic review
Yosuke Sakurai1, Yujiro Yokoyama2, Shinichi Fukuhara3
1Department of Surgery, Marshall University Joan Edwards School of Medicine, WVa.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) showed higher mortality and repeat interventions compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A Heart Team approach is crucial for patient selection.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Severe aortic stenosis with concurrent coronary artery disease presents a complex treatment challenge.
- Choosing between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) requires careful consideration of outcomes.
Approach:
- A comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted, synthesizing data from two randomized controlled trials and six observational studies.
- The analysis included a large patient cohort (104,220 patients) comparing TAVR + PCI versus SAVR + CABG.
- Outcomes evaluated included mortality, reintervention, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, and periprocedural complications.
Key Points:
- TAVR + PCI was linked to increased all-cause mortality and coronary reintervention during follow-up.
- Higher rates of permanent pacemaker implantation and vascular complications were observed with TAVR + PCI.
- Conversely, TAVR + PCI demonstrated a lower incidence of 30-day acute kidney injury.
Conclusions:
- For patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, TAVR + PCI is associated with greater long-term all-cause mortality compared to SAVR + CABG.
- The findings underscore the continued importance of a Heart Team approach for optimal TAVR candidacy assessment and treatment planning.
Objective:
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Methods:
The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through November 2021 to identify studies comparing TAVR + PCI and SAVR + CABG for severe aortic stenosis with concurrent coronary artery disease. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, repeat coronary intervention, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke during follow-up, and 30-day periprocedural outcomes.
Results:
Two randomized controlled trials and 6 observational studies including a total of 104,220 patients (TAVR + PCI, n = 5004; SAVR + CABG, n = 99,216) were included. The weighted mean follow-up period was 30.2 months. TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality and coronary reintervention during follow-up period (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.65; P = .003, hazard ratio, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.74-9.86; P = .001, respectively), 30-day permanent pacemaker implantation rate (odds ratio [OR], 3.79; 95% CI, 1.61-8.95; P = .002), and periprocedural vascular complications (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.85-26.30; P = .004). In contrast, TAVR + PCI was associated with a lower rate of 30-day acute kidney injury (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.50; P = .0001). Rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke during follow-up, and other periprocedural outcomes including 30-day mortality were similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
In patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, TAVR + PCI was associated with greater all-cause mortality at follow-up compared with SAVR + CABG. Heart Team approach to assess TAVR candidacy remains imperative.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Angina IV: Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
