Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Signals

Classification of Signals

In signal processing, signals are classified based on various characteristics: continuous-time versus discrete-time, periodic versus aperiodic, analog versus digital, and causal versus noncausal. Each category highlights distinct properties crucial for understanding and manipulating signals.
A continuous-time signal holds a value at every instant in time, representing information seamlessly. In contrast, a discrete-time signal holds values only at specific moments, often denoted as x(n), where...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Transfer learning to account for sound speed changes: Example for source ranging in underwater laboratory tank.

JASA express letters·2025

Same author

Introduction to the special issue on assessing sediment heterogeneity on continental shelves and slopesa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Same author

Maximum Entropy Estimates of Hubble Constant from Planck Measurements.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same author

Comparison and combination of matched-field and modal-dispersion inversion for seabed geoacoustic profiles at the New England Mud Patch

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Same author

Bayesian matched-field inversion for shear and compressional geoacoustic profiles at the New England Mud Patcha).

JASA express letters·2025

Same author

Ensemble approach to deep learning seabed classification using multichannel ship noisea).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Same journal

Amplitude-invariant phase masking for coherence recovery in scattered wavefields.

JASA express letters·2026

Same journal

Detecting continuous and discrete frequency changes as a function of spectral resolvability and modulation rate.

JASA express letters·2026

Same journal

Bearings-only acoustic source localization method using two distributed gliders and deep ocean experimental validation in the South China Sea.

JASA express letters·2026

Same journal

Block-sparse enhancement and detection of envelope modulation on noise for ship radiated noise.

JASA express letters·2026

Same journal

Predicting acoustic field with a separate variable ocean physics-informed neural network.

JASA express letters·2026

Same journal

Extending Sottek Hearing Model loudness to estimate partially-masked sound qualities of loudness, tonality, and sharpness.

JASA express letters·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

Validating deep learning seabed classification via acoustic similarity.

David J Forman¹, Tracianne B Neilsen², David F Van Komen²

¹Department of Physics, Hillsdale College, Hillsdale, Michigan 49242, USA.

JASA Express Letters

|September 26, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning classifies seabed types by acoustic effect, not just sediment data. This method accurately matches real seabeds to acoustic classes, improving seabed characterization.

More Related Videos

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Measuring the Structure, Composition, and Change of Underwater Environments with Large-area Imaging

Published on: April 18, 2025

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Flying Insect Detection and Classification with Inexpensive Sensors

Published on: October 15, 2014

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

Area of Science:

Marine geophysics
Acoustic seabed classification
Machine learning applications

Background:

Traditional seabed characterization relies on individual sediment parameters.
Acoustic properties offer a holistic view of seabed composition.
Deep learning presents a novel approach to acoustic seabed analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate a deep learning classifier for seabed characterization based on acoustic similarity.
To assess the classifier's performance on unseen seabed data.
To introduce a metric for acoustic similarity between seabed classes.

Main Methods:

Training a deep learning classifier on 1D synthetic waveforms from underwater explosive sources.
Defining 13 distinct seabed classes based on acoustic similarity.
Testing the classifier's accuracy on independent seabed datasets.

Main Results:

The deep learning classifier successfully distinguished 13 seabed classes.
The classifier achieved 96% accuracy in matching real seabeds to the top-3 most similar training classes.
The study quantifies classifier performance against natural seabed variability.

Conclusions:

A class-based, acoustic-focused deep learning approach is effective for seabed characterization.
This method offers improved accuracy and robustness compared to traditional parameter-focused techniques.
The findings support the use of machine learning for advanced marine acoustic analysis.