Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
SVEAT score outperforms HEART score in patients admitted to a chest pain observation unit
Daniel Antwi-Amoabeng1, Chanwit Roongsritong2, Moutaz Taha1
1Department of Internal Medicine, Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89502, United States.
Background:
Timely and accurate identification of subgroup at risk for major adverse cardiovascular events among patients presenting with acute chest pain remains a challenge. Currently available risk stratification scores are suboptimal. Recently, a new scoring system called the Symptoms, history of Vascular disease, Electrocardiography, Age, and Troponin (SVEAT) score has been shown to outperform the History, Electrocardiography, Age, Risk factors and Troponin (HEART) score, one of the most used risk scores in the United States.
Aim:
To assess the potential usefulness of the SVEAT score as a risk stratification tool by comparing its performance to HEART score in chest pain patients with low suspicion for acute coronary syndrome and admitted for overnight observation.
Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 330 consecutive patients admitted to our clinical decision unit for acute chest pain between January 1st to April 17th, 2019. To avoid potential biases, investigators assigned to calculate the SVEAT, and HEART scores were blinded to the results of 30-d combined endpoint of death, acute myocardial infarction or confirmed coronary artery disease requiring revascularization or medical therapy [30-d major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)]. An area under receiving-operator characteristic curve (AUC) for each score was then calculated. C-statistic and logistic model were used to compare predictive performance of the two scores.
Results:
A 30-d MACE was observed in 11 patients (3.33% of the subjects). The AUC of SVEAT score (0.8876, 95%CI: 0.82-0.96) was significantly higher than the AUC of HEART score (0.7962, 95%CI: 0.71-0.88), P = 0.03. Using logistic model, SVEAT score with cut-off of 4 or less significantly predicts 30-d MACE (odd ratio 1.52, 95%CI: 1.19-1.95, P = 0.001) but not the HEART score (odd ratio 1.29, 95%CI: 0.78-2.14, P = 0.32).
Conclusion:
The SVEAT score is superior to the HEART score as a risk stratification tool for acute chest pain in low to intermediate risk patients.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
04:20Integration of Brain Tissue Saturation Monitoring in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients with Heart Failure
Published on: October 1, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System IV: Auscultation
Normal Heart Sounds
S1 (First Heart Sound)-
S1 is made by the closure of the mitral and tricuspid valves (atrioventricular valves), marking the beginning of systole.
S2 (Second Heart Sound)-
S2 is made by the closure of the aortic and pulmonic valves (semilunar valves), marking the end of the systole.
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction