Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

117
The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
117
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

175
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
175
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

232
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
232
Introduction To Survival Analysis01:18

Introduction To Survival Analysis

350
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to study time-to-event data, where the "event" might represent outcomes like death, disease relapse, system failure, or recovery. A unique feature of survival data is censoring, which occurs when the event of interest has not been observed for some individuals during the study period. This requires specialized techniques to handle incomplete data effectively.
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
350

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health personality and health-related quality of life after temporary ileostomy closure in rectal cancer survivors: a comparative study of open and laparoscopic surgery groups.

Psychology, health & medicine·2026
Same author

Leveraging ANACONDA for Data Quality Assessment in National Mortality Databases: The Serbian Case Study.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Gastric Cancer Surgery: Bridging Early Diagnosis and Responsible Precision Medicine.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Psychometric Evaluation of the Serbian Version of the Southampton Dupuytren's Scoring Scheme in Patients with Dupuytren's Contracture.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

First Balkan Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-B) among high-risk pregnancies.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Nutritional Adequacy and Day-to-Day Energy Variability: Impacts on Outcomes in Severe Trauma Patients.

Nutrients·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
07:57

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage

Published on: November 20, 2016

12.6K

Predicting mortality in severe polytrauma with limited resources.

Daniel Rajko Mijaljica1, Pavle Gregoric2, Nenad Ivancevic2

  • 1Clinic For Emergency Surgery, Emergency Center, Clinical Center Of Serbia, Pasterova 2, Belgrade, Serbia.

Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi = Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery : TJTES
|September 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary

The APACHE 2 and TRISS trauma scores are the most effective predictors of mortality in injured patients, even in resource-limited settings. These scores aid in critical decision-making for trauma care and outcome assessment.

More Related Videos

Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
07:48

Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock

Published on: October 28, 2022

1.3K
Pseudofracture: An Acute Peripheral Tissue Trauma Model
10:08

Pseudofracture: An Acute Peripheral Tissue Trauma Model

Published on: April 18, 2011

14.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage
07:57

Integrated Compensatory Responses in a Human Model of Hemorrhage

Published on: November 20, 2016

12.6K
Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock
07:48

Noninvasive and Invasive Renal Hypoxia Monitoring in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock

Published on: October 28, 2022

1.3K
Pseudofracture: An Acute Peripheral Tissue Trauma Model
10:08

Pseudofracture: An Acute Peripheral Tissue Trauma Model

Published on: April 18, 2011

14.8K

Area of Science:

  • Trauma care research
  • Medical scoring systems
  • Emergency medicine

Background:

  • Objective evaluation of patient severity is vital for effective trauma management and outcome assessment.
  • This study compared six trauma scores to identify the best mortality predictors in resource-limited environments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the predictive power of six widely used trauma scores for mortality.
  • To identify the most effective trauma score for predicting mortality in limited-resource settings.

Main Methods:

  • Seventy-five polytraumatized patients (ISS≥16, SOFA≥5) were analyzed.
  • Logistic regression and ROC curve analysis (AUC) were used to evaluate score performance.
  • Included scores: Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), APACHE 2, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and Kampala Trauma Score (KTS).

Main Results:

  • All six trauma scores significantly predicted mortality (p<0.001).
  • The TRISS and APACHE 2 scores demonstrated the highest predictive power, with AUCs of 0.9 and 0.866, respectively.
  • Cut-off values for mortality prediction were identified for ISS, NISS, APACHE 2, and SOFA.

Conclusions:

  • APACHE 2 and TRISS are the most powerful mortality predictors in trauma patients, even in resource-limited settings.
  • The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) did not perform as expected despite statistical significance.
  • Recommended use: KTS for the 'golden hour,' ISS or NISS upon admission, and APACHE 2 or TRISS within 24 hours of ICU admission.