Measuring patient compliance with wearing graduated compression stockings

Patient compliance is an essential precondition for assessing the effectiveness of graduated compression stockings (GCS). However, patient compliance with use of GCS has not received sufficient attention. Only a few clinical studies have explicitly evaluated patients' adherence to GCS therapy, and the instruments used to measure patient compliance have either not been well adapted to daily use or lacked scientific development techniques. Most instruments have focused on "wear or not wear" or "how long did you wear" questions, which do not consider all the perspectives on patient compliance. In the present study, we used scale development and validation steps to create a self-reported questionnaire to measure patients' compliance with wearing GCS.

We designed a questionnaire to measure compliance with wearing GCS among patients who had undergone invasive treatment of superficial varicose veins of the lower extremities. The initial questions were determined after a literature review and interviews with experts and patients. Reliability was evaluated using the Delphi method with expert judges, pretesting, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the questionnaire's validity.

The developed questionnaire had 11 questions with the responses rated from 1 to 4 and included three factors: compliance with correct GCS wearing methods, compliance with GCS wearing cautions, and compliance with seeking advice. The Cronbach alpha for the overall questionnaire was 0.853 (factor 1, 0.934; factor 2, 0.803; factor 3, 0.789), its content validity was good, and the factor structure fitted the data well.

We have presented our initial version of the questionnaire for patients who have undergone invasive treatment of superficial varicose veins of the lower extremities. The questionnaire can be used to evaluate patient compliance with wearing GCS thoroughly and effectively. However, further work is still required to maximize its reliability and validity for its use in daily practice in the future.