Coupling Between Subregional Oscillators Within the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Determines Free-Running Period in the Rat

Rats housed in a 22-h light-dark cycle (11:11, T22) exhibit 2 distinct circadian locomotor activity (LMA) bouts simultaneously: one is entrained to the LD cycle and a second dissociated bout maintains a period greater than 24 h. These 2 activity bouts are associated with independent clock gene oscillations in the ventrolateral (vl-) and dorsomedial (dm-) suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), respectively. Previous results in our laboratory have shown that the vl- and dm-SCN oscillators are weakly coupled under T22 and that the period of the dissociated bout depends on coupling between the 2 subdivisions. Here, we sought to study the behavior of the T22 SCN pacemaker upon release into free-running conditions and compare it to the behavior of the system upon release from typical 24-h (12:12, T24) entrainment. T22-desynchronized rats or T24-entrained rats were released into constant darkness (DD). Activity rhythms in T22 rats rapidly resynchronized upon release into DD, and the free-running period (FRP) of the fused rhythm was longer than the FRP of T24 rats. We then asked whether the in vivo period changes were also present in the ex vivo SCN. Per1-luc rats were desynchronized in T22 for assessment of SCN Per1-luc ex vivo. Similar to behavioral FRP, the period of ex vivo SCN explanted from T22 rats was longer than that for T24 animals. Mathematical models supported the observed behavior of the dual oscillator system as the result of mutual coupling between the vl- and dm-SCN oscillators. This bidirectionally coupled model predicted both the FRP of the T22 system and its phase-shifting response to light. Together, these data support a model of pacemaker organization in which a light-sensitive vl-SCN oscillator is mutually coupled with a light-insensitive dm-SCN oscillator, and together they determine the period of the coupled system as a whole and its response to light pulses.