Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stability of structures01:14

Stability of structures

236
In mechanical engineering, the stability of systems under various forces is critical for designing durable and efficient structures. One fundamental way to explore these concepts is by analyzing systems like two rods connected at a pivot point, O, with a torsional spring of spring constant k at the pivot point. This system is similar in appearance to a scissor jack used to change tires on a car. In this case, the arms of the linkage (equivalent to the rods in this system) are entirely vertical,...
236
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

3.5K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
3.5K
Strength of Cement01:20

Strength of Cement

209
Strength tests for cement are not performed directly on neat cement paste due to difficulty in obtaining consistent, reliable specimens. Instead, cement is typically tested in the form of cement-sand mortar.
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
209
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.3K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.3K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

280
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
280
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

308
Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key...
308

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A single-centre, randomised comparison of the performance and safety of a novel mechanomyography sensor with electromyography.

British journal of anaesthesia·2026
Same author

Preventing postoperative pulmonary complications by establishing a machine-learning assisted approach (PEPPERMINT): Study protocol for the creation of a risk prediction model.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Improved pathogen identification in sepsis or septic shock by clinical metagenomic sequencing.

The Journal of infection·2025
Same author

Evidence from a Bayesian reanalysis of the iPROVE-OLV study: is it time to update our prior assumptions regarding neuromuscular block and reversal?

British journal of anaesthesia·2025
Same author

Precision of electromyography according to the calibration approach of neuromuscular monitoring: a randomised prospective agreement study.

Journal of clinical monitoring and computing·2025
Same author

Reliability of pre-admission patient-reported outcome measures postoperatively assessed via proxies: a prospective, multicenter observational study.

Critical care (London, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Measuring the Strength of Mice
06:17

Measuring the Strength of Mice

Published on: June 2, 2013

54.7K

How robust are the STRONGER and STIL-STRONGER studies?

Manfred Blobner1, Jennifer M Hunter2, Kurt Ulm3

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

British Journal of Anaesthesia
|October 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Sugammadex reduces postoperative pulmonary complications compared to neostigmine, particularly in high-risk patients. A secondary analysis confirms sugammadex

Keywords:
neostigmineneuromuscular blocking drugsneuromuscular monitoringpulmonary complicationssugammadex

More Related Videos

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

9.2K
Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
12:59

Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People

Published on: July 5, 2017

12.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 27, 2025

Measuring the Strength of Mice
06:17

Measuring the Strength of Mice

Published on: June 2, 2013

54.7K
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

9.2K
Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
12:59

Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People

Published on: July 5, 2017

12.7K

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology and critical care medicine.
  • Pharmacology and drug safety.
  • Surgical outcomes research.

Background:

  • The STRONGER study (2020) first indicated sugammadex's benefit over neostigmine in reducing postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).
  • A secondary analysis, STIL-STRONGER, re-examined data focusing on high-risk and older patients undergoing prolonged elective surgery.
  • Both studies investigated the impact of neuromuscular blockade reversal agents on patient outcomes.

Discussion:

  • This analysis scrutinizes the statistical methodologies employed in both STRONGER and STIL-STRONGER studies.
  • It explores how potential limitations in statistical analysis might have influenced the observed differences between sugammadex and neostigmine regarding PPCs.
  • The discussion emphasizes the need for careful interpretation of statistical findings in clinical research.

Key Insights:

  • Sugammadex demonstrates a continued association with fewer PPCs compared to neostigmine, especially in vulnerable patient populations.
  • The STIL-STRONGER study reinforces sugammadex's potential advantages in specific surgical contexts.
  • Statistical nuances warrant consideration when evaluating the comparative efficacy of these reversal agents.

Outlook:

  • Further research may refine statistical approaches to better elucidate the precise benefits of sugammadex.
  • Clinical guidelines may evolve based on robust evidence regarding sugammadex's role in minimizing postoperative complications.
  • Investigating long-term outcomes associated with different reversal agents remains an important area for future study.