Pediatric language assessments via telehealth: A systematic review

Alliete R Alfano1, Iliana Concepcion1, Ashley Espinosa1

  • 1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.

Insights

Telehealth language assessments for children are as reliable as in-person evaluations. This remote approach offers a feasible alternative for speech-language pathology services, ensuring timely intervention for communication delays.

Area of Science:

  • Speech-language pathology
  • Pediatric audiology and communication disorders
  • Telehealth and digital health

Background:

  • Early identification of communication delays in children is critical for intervention.
  • Limited access to formal assessments can impede language development.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the need for and adoption of telehealth services in speech-language pathology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review existing literature on the efficacy of telehealth for pediatric language assessments.
  • To compare the reliability and feasibility of remote versus face-to-face language evaluations.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a systematic literature search across four electronic databases.
  • Included studies published from 2010 onwards, in English, focusing on preschool/elementary children undergoing telehealth language assessments.
  • Analyzed studies for comparability of telehealth and face-to-face assessment scores and ratings.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences were found between standard scores and behavioral ratings for telehealth and face-to-face assessments.
  • Telehealth delivery of language assessments was determined to be feasible.
  • High levels of agreement indicate adequate reliability for telehealth assessments compared to in-person evaluations.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence supports the use of telehealth for administering language-based assessments with comparable outcomes to traditional methods.
  • Further research is recommended for specific populations (bilingual children, under-fours) and settings (schools, clinics).
Abstract

Related Concept Videos