Comparing exposed and buried Kirschner wires in fixation for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: A propensity

Seigo Suganuma1, Kaoru Tada2, Shingo Takagawa1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 37076Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan.

Insights

Exposed Kirschner wires (K-wires) in pediatric humerus fractures showed more backing out, while buried K-wires led to increased outpatient visits and longer hospital stays. This study compares outcomes for both fixation methods in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Pediatric Orthopedics
  • Traumatology

Background:

  • Pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures are common injuries requiring surgical fixation.
  • Kirschner wires (K-wires) are frequently used for stabilization, with options for exposed or buried placement.
  • The optimal K-wire technique for pediatric fractures remains a subject of clinical debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of exposed versus buried Kirschner wires (K-wires) for treating pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures.
  • To evaluate differences in complication rates, patient follow-up, and hospitalization duration between the two K-wire fixation methods.
  • To assess the impact of K-wire placement on fracture reduction and stability.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective study analyzed patients undergoing K-wire fixation for supracondylar humerus fractures between 2007 and 2021.
  • Data collected included patient demographics, fracture patterns, K-wire type (exposed vs. buried), operative details, and postoperative outcomes.
  • Propensity score matching was employed to create comparable groups for analysis of complications, outpatient visits, and hospitalization length.

Main Results:

  • After propensity score matching (43 pairs), exposed K-wires showed significantly more backing out (p < 0.01), while buried K-wires were associated with more skin irritation.
  • The buried K-wire group experienced significantly more outpatient visits (p < 0.01) and longer total hospitalization durations (p < 0.01).
  • No significant differences were observed in other complications, loss of reduction, or radiographic parameters like Baumann's angle and tilting angle between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • While exposed K-wires present a risk of backing out, buried K-wires lead to increased healthcare utilization and parental burden due to more outpatient visits and longer hospital stays.
  • The choice between exposed and buried K-wires involves balancing risks of mechanical complications against those of increased healthcare resource utilization.
  • Further research may explore patient-reported outcome measures to fully elucidate the long-term implications of each K-wire technique.
Abstract