Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Location of visual field defects and their impact on vision-related quality of life in glaucoma: A systematic review.

Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry·2026
Same author

Extravascular Motion Signal Detected by OCT Angiography Indicates Altered Vascular-Tissue Biomechanical Interactions in Glaucoma.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Glaucomatous Remodeling of the Lamina Cribrosa: Association With Visual Field Progression.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Microvascular Volume Loss Exceeds Nerve Fiber Layer but Not Neuroretinal Rim Tissue Loss During Progression of Nonhuman Primate Experimental Glaucoma.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Forecasting mean deviation in glaucoma patients using an irregular autoregressive time series method.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Automated Spectral-Domain Versus Swept-Source OCT Angiography in Relation to Glaucoma Severity.

Journal of glaucoma·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K

Moving Stimulus Perimetry: A New Functional Test for Glaucoma.

Stuart K Gardiner1, Steven L Mansberger1

  • 1Devers Eye Institute, Legacy Health, Portland, OR, USA.

Translational Vision Science & Technology
|October 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Moving stimuli improve glaucoma testing by increasing sensitivity and reducing variability, allowing reliable assessment in more advanced disease stages. This method enhances the dynamic range for better patient outcomes.

More Related Videos

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
10:10

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents

Published on: February 15, 2022

1.5K
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

6.5K
Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
10:10

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents

Published on: February 15, 2022

1.5K
Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Neuroscience
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Static perimetry in glaucoma suffers from high variability, limiting its reliability for detecting vision loss, especially in advanced stages.
  • Current methods struggle with excessive variability for sensitivities below 19 dB, hindering accurate glaucoma assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of moving stimuli in enhancing perimetric sensitivity and reducing test-retest variability in glaucoma patients.
  • To determine if moving stimuli can extend the dynamic range of perimetry for more reliable testing in advanced glaucoma.

Main Methods:

  • A moving stimulus was designed and compared to an identical static stimulus.
  • Psychometric functions were measured to assess dynamic range, and test-retest variability was evaluated in glaucoma patients and suspects over six months.
  • Generalized estimating equation regression models compared pointwise sensitivity estimates.

Main Results:

  • Moving stimuli yielded higher sensitivities (P < 0.001) and improved the dynamic range, with 8 locations extending beyond 90% maximum response probability.
  • Test-retest limits of agreement were significantly narrower for moving stimuli (-6.35 to +6.48 dB) compared to static stimuli (-12.7 to +7.81 dB).
  • A majority of subjects (62%) preferred the moving stimuli over static stimuli (19%).

Conclusions:

  • Moving stimuli enhance perimetric sensitivity in glaucomatous visual field defects, extending the reliable testing range.
  • This approach offers improved repeatability and patient preference, enabling more accurate monitoring of glaucoma progression.
  • Moving stimuli facilitate reliable testing in patients with more severe glaucoma than previously possible.