Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
Published on: July 10, 2015
Comparison and calibration of methods for ambient reactive mercury quantification
Sarrah M Dunham-Cheatham1, Seth Lyman2, Mae Sexauer Gustin1
1Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Mail Stop 186, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Accurate measurements of atmospheric reactive mercury (RM) are crucial. Membrane-based and dual-channel systems show promise for quantifying gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), essential for ecosystem deposition studies.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Chemistry
- Atmospheric Science
- Mercury Speciation
Background:
- Gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM) is the primary form of atmospheric mercury (Hg) deposited into ecosystems.
- Accurate and calibrated measurements of GOM are essential for understanding mercury cycling and environmental impacts.
- Existing measurement techniques require thorough evaluation for reliability and precision.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of active membrane-based collection systems (RMAS) with dual-channel systems (DCS) and a Tekran speciation system for measuring GOM and reactive mercury (RM).
- To assess the accuracy and long-term precision of a custom-built automated calibration system for mercury speciation instruments.
- To identify limitations and interferences associated with different atmospheric mercury measurement methodologies.
Main Methods:
- Co-location of two RMAS, two DCS, and one Tekran 2537/1130 system for one year.
- One DCS was coupled with a custom automated calibration system using gaseous elemental mercury (GEM), HgBr2, or HgCl2.
- Gaseous oxidized mercury (GOM), particulate-bound mercury (PBM), and reactive mercury (RM = GOM + PBM) were quantified.
Main Results:
- The Tekran system measured significantly less GOM (~14.5%) compared to the other systems.
- DCS and RMAS showed significant correlation, but DCS measurements were higher (50% and 30% higher than RMAS).
- The automated calibration system demonstrated consistent performance, and the DCS accurately recovered injected GOM, indicating DCS accuracy for RM/GOM measurement.
Conclusions:
- Both calibrated and uncalibrated DCS provide accurate measurements for reactive mercury (RM) and/or GOM.
- Active membrane-based collection systems (RMAS) may experience some mercury loss from membranes during sampling.
- Dual-channel systems offer a reliable method for atmospheric reactive mercury monitoring, complementing other techniques.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Gravimetry: Overview
In precipitation gravimetry, the analyte is converted into a precipitate and weighed. For example, the silver content in a sample can be estimated by precipitating and...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing...
Voltammetry: Overview
A voltammetric cell uses three electrodes: a working electrode, a reference electrode, and an auxiliary electrode. The redox reactions occur in the working...
Voltammetric Techniques: Linear-Scan (E vs Time)
Instrument Calibration
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
Flame Photometry: Lab

