Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

799
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
799
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.4K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

946
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
946
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

764
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
764
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

75.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
75.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correcting fast irregular motion in PET: maximum-likelihood motion and activity (MLMA) reconstruction.

EJNMMI physics·2026
Same author

Motion mitigation in positron-emission tomography guided radiotherapy delivered on a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator.

Physics and imaging in radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Mapping Neurodegenerative Changes in Clinically Uncertain Parkinsonian Syndrome Patients Using Fast MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time-Domain (MR-STAT) Relaxometry at 3T.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Standardization of MR Electrical Properties Tomography: A Guideline From the ISMRM Electro-Magnetic Tissue Properties Study Group.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2026
Same author

Efficient estimation of gadolinium-based contrast agent concentration using transient-state keyhole MR-STAT.

Medical physics·2025
Same author

Motion correction in CBCT imaging using gate-less model-based reconstruction of non-rigid motion and images.

Medical physics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.5K

Uncertainty Assessment for Deep Learning Radiotherapy Applications.

Cornelis A T van den Berg1, Ettore F Meliadò2

  • 1Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Computational Imaging Group for MR diagnostics & therapy, Center for Image Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Seminars in Radiation Oncology
|October 6, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning in radiotherapy shows promise for automating workflows but requires robust uncertainty quantification. Addressing epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties is crucial for safe clinical integration and reliable automated predictions.

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
08:34

Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies

Published on: February 6, 2019

20.5K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K
Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
08:17

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy

Published on: June 7, 2015

15.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Deep learning (DL) has rapidly advanced in radiotherapy over the last 5 years.
  • Radiotherapy data's structured nature facilitates DL applications, offering automation potential for laborious tasks.
  • Fundamental weaknesses in DL, particularly regarding data origin assumptions and residual uncertainties, necessitate careful consideration for clinical use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain concepts of uncertainty quantification in DL for the radiotherapy community.
  • To detail epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties and their modeling techniques in DL.
  • To demonstrate the application of uncertainty assessment in radiotherapy DL workflows.

Main Methods:

  • Review and explanation of general concepts of uncertainty in DL, drawing from computer vision literature.
  • Detailed description of epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty modeling techniques.
  • Demonstration using three radiotherapy DL applications: dose prediction, synthetic CT generation, and contouring.

Main Results:

  • DL models must indicate when predictions exceed uncertainty thresholds for safe clinical deployment.
  • Uncertainty quantification can enhance confidence in automated DL-driven radiotherapy workflows.
  • While promising, current methods for distinguishing in-distribution from out-of-distribution samples are immature, requiring QA and human oversight.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning offers significant value in radiotherapy, but its clinical integration demands rigorous uncertainty assessment.
  • Understanding and modeling epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties are key to maximizing DL's potential in radiotherapy.
  • Continued research and development are needed for robust automated quality assurance in DL-based radiotherapy systems.