Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

527
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
527
Bias01:22

Bias

4.8K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Graph Neural Networks for Medical Imaging Analysis and Biological Data: Integrating Topology, Geometry, Radiomics, and Generative AI.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Invited Commentary: Postdeployment Monitoring of AI in Radiology: Beyond the Test Set.

Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc·2026
Same author

A 10-Year Comprehensive, Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis on Juxtapleural Nodules: Insights into Classification and Risk.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Radiomics and deep learning models for predicting glioma p53 status: A diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Clinical imaging·2026
Same author

MRI Deep Learning for Differentiating Glioblastoma, IDH Wild-type from Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Cancer research communications·2026
Same author

NeuroAIHub: An AI-Driven Framework for Automated Curation and Discovery of Neuroradiology Datasets.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2026
Same journal

Externally Tested AI for Lung Nodule Classification: A Realistic Benchmark for an Emerging Screening Era.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Impact of Exposure Parameters on Deep Learning Models in Chest Radiography and Implications for Deployment.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Impact on Cost and Expert Time of Data-Efficient Deep Learning for Medical Image Segmentation.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking of AI and Radiologists for Indeterminate Lung Nodule Malignancy Risk Estimation on Screening CT: The LUNA25 Challenge.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

When One Sequence Is Enough-And When It Isn't.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
Same journal

Cracking the Registration Conundrum in Breast MRI: Preserving the Tumor Signal to Reveal True Treatment Change.

Radiology. Artificial intelligence·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K

Mitigating Bias in Radiology Machine Learning: 1. Data Handling.

Pouria Rouzrokh1, Bardia Khosravi1, Shahriar Faghani1

  • 1Radiology Informatics Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.

Radiology. Artificial Intelligence
|October 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Minimizing bias in machine learning (ML) is crucial for clinical practice. This study details 12 suboptimal data handling practices that introduce bias in ML models, offering mitigation strategies to improve performance.

Keywords:
BiasComputer-aided Diagnosis (CAD)Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)Data HandlingDeep LearningMachine Learning

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

6.9K
Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • Minimizing bias is essential for the clinical adoption of machine learning (ML) models.
  • Systematic mathematical biases in ML systems lead to performance discrepancies and suboptimal clinical outcomes.
  • Bias can originate from data handling, model development, and performance evaluation phases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and explain 12 suboptimal practices in the data handling phase of ML studies.
  • To illustrate how these practices introduce bias into ML models.
  • To provide mitigation strategies for preventing bias during data handling.

Main Methods:

  • A framework categorizing ML data handling into four steps: data collection, data investigation, data splitting, and feature engineering.
  • Review of existing research literature to identify suboptimal practices and their impact.
  • Development of code examples in a Google Colaboratory Jupyter notebook to demonstrate bias and prevention.

Main Results:

  • Identification of 12 specific suboptimal data handling practices that contribute to ML bias.
  • Explanation of the mechanisms through which these practices create bias.
  • Demonstration of bias-inducing scenarios and their corresponding mitigation techniques using code.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing suboptimal data handling practices is critical for reducing bias in clinical ML.
  • Implementing recommended mitigation strategies can improve the reliability and performance of ML models in healthcare.
  • This work provides practical guidance and tools for researchers and developers to build less biased ML systems.