Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

10:22
Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
8.3K
Comparing measurement uncertainty values.
Analytical Methods : Advancing Methods and Applications
|October 7, 2022
Summary
Comparing measurement uncertainty (MU) components is crucial for cost-effective method improvement. Reducing sampling uncertainty significantly lowers overall MU for field measurements, enhancing data reliability.
Area of Science:
- Analytical Chemistry
- Metrology
- Environmental Science
Background:
- Measurement uncertainty (MU) is essential for assessing data reliability and fitness for purpose (FFP).
- Comparing MU estimates helps in method selection and identifying areas for improvement.
- MU values themselves are estimates and have associated uncertainties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the utility of comparing MU estimates.
- To compare MU components (sampling vs. analytical) for cost-effective reduction.
- To evaluate MU for in situ vs. laboratory methods.
Main Methods:
- Statistical comparison of MU estimates.
- Component analysis of total MU.
- Case study: Nitrate concentration in lettuce.
Main Results:
- Comparison of MU components is feasible and informative.
- Sampling uncertainty can be a significant contributor to overall MU.
- Reducing sampling MU offers a cost-effective strategy for improving overall MU.
Conclusions:
- Comparing MU components enables targeted improvements.
- Reducing sampling MU is more cost-effective than reducing analytical MU for nitrate in lettuce.
- MU estimation and comparison are vital for optimizing analytical methods.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
39.3K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
39.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
75.3K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
75.3K
Uncertainty: Overview
799
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
799
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures
65.4K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
65.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
946
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
946
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
764
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
764

