Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2025

Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
Published on: March 8, 2018
Mental health screening and assessment tools for forcibly displaced children: a systematic review
Ilse L Verhagen1, Marc J Noom2, Ramón J L Lindauer1
1Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Insights
Mental health assessment tools for displaced youth are evaluated for reliability and validity. While some instruments show promise, more research is needed for cross-cultural validation and optimal use in this vulnerable population.
Area of Science:
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
- Global Mental Health
- Psychometrics
Background:
- A significant global population of forcibly displaced individuals are children and youth.
- These young populations face heightened risks for mental health issues due to exposure to trauma.
- There is a critical need for reliable and valid mental health assessment tools for this demographic.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
- To assess the validity and reliability of mental health assessment tools for asylum-seeking, refugee, and internally displaced children and youth.
Main Methods:
- Conducted systematic literature searches across four major databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science).
- Evaluated study quality using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist.
- Assessed PROMs based on COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties.
Main Results:
- Screened 4842 articles, with 27 studies meeting eligibility criteria.
- Evaluated 28 PROMs for reliability, internal consistency, structural validity, hypotheses testing, and criterion validity.
- Identified several instruments suitable for measuring emotional/behavioral problems, PTSD, anxiety, and depression.
Conclusions:
- Several PROMs demonstrate adequate validity and reliability for assessing mental health in forcibly displaced children and youth.
- Further high-quality research is essential to establish cross-cultural validity and optimal cut-off scores.
- A core set of instruments cannot yet be recommended, emphasizing the need for continued research and best practice guidance.
Abstract:
Background: An unprecedentedly large number of people worldwide are forcibly displaced, of which more than 40 percent are under 18 years of age. Forcibly displaced children and youth have often been exposed to stressful life events and are therefore at increased risk of developing mental health issues. Hence, early screening and assessment for mental health problems is of great importance, as is research addressing this topic. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the reliability and validity of mental health assessment tools for this population. Objective: The aim of the present study was to synthesise the existing evidence on psychometric properties of patient reported outcome measures [PROMs] for assessing the mental health of asylum-seeking, refugee and internally displaced children and youth. Method: Systematic searches of the literature were conducted in four electronic databases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and Web of Science. The methodological quality of the studies was examined using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. Furthermore, the COSMIN criteria for good measurement properties were used to evaluate the quality of the outcome measures. Results: The search yielded 4842 articles, of which 27 met eligibility criteria. The reliability, internal consistency, structural validity, hypotheses testing and criterion validity of 28 PROMs were evaluated. Conclusion: Based on the results with regard to validity and reliability, as well as feasibility, we recommend the use of several instruments to measure emotional and behavioural problems, PTSD symptoms, anxiety and depression in forcibly displaced children and youth. However, despite a call for more research on the psychometric properties of mental health assessment tools for forcibly displaced children and youth, there is still a lack of studies conducted on this topic. More research is needed in order to establish cross-cultural validity of mental health assessment tools and to provide optimal cut-off scores for this population. HIGHLIGHTS Research on the psychometric properties of mental health screening and assessment tools for forcibly displaced children and youth is slowly increasing.However, based on the current evidence on the validity and reliability of screening and assessment tools for forcibly displaced children, we are not able to recommend a core set of instruments. Instead, we provide suggestions for best practice.More research of sufficient quality is important in order to establish crsoss-cultural validity and to provide optimal cut-off scores in mental health screening and assessment tools for different populations of forcibly displaced children and youth.

