Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

The Representativeness Heuristic

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.

Probability Laws

Probability Laws

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...

Law of Independent Assortment

Law of Independent Assortment

While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.

Pedigree Analysis

Pedigree Analysis

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Commentary: On the Equal-Opportunity Jerk "Defense": Rudeness Complicates Sexism Attributions but Comes at a Cost.

Psychological science·2026

Same author

Citation penalties following sexual versus scientific misconduct allegations.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Choices without preferences: Principles of rational arbitrariness.

Psychological review·2025

Same author

Incomplete preferences and rational framing effects.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022

Same author

Sensitivity to shifts in probability of harm and benefit in moral dilemmas.

Cognition·2021

Same author

Default sensitivity in attempts at social influence.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 26, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Is it a judgment of representativeness? Re-examining the birth sequence problem.

Lim M Leong¹, Johannes Müller-Trede², Craig R M McKenzie^3,4

¹Department of Psychology, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, #0109, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. lmleong@ucsd.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

|October 11, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People often misjudge birth order likelihoods due to representativeness bias. However, this study shows people adaptively infer probabilities from comparison direction, not flawed cognition.

Keywords:

Biases Cognitive reference points Heuristics Judgment Perceptions of randomness Representativeness

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 26, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Simultaneous Assessment of Kinship, Division Number, and Phenotype via Flow Cytometry for Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells

Published on: March 24, 2023

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Linguistics
Behavioral Economics

Background:

The "birth sequence problem" traditionally suggests human cognitive biases in probability judgments.
Participants often deem less representative birth order sequences as less likely, despite equiprobability.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the role of comparison direction in perceived birth order likelihood.
To determine if pragmatic inferences, rather than cognitive biases, explain judgments in the birth sequence problem.

Main Methods:

Conducted three experiments with a total of 1,136 participants.
Manipulated the direction of comparison for birth order sequences.
Introduced an inverted "speaker" problem to assess referent placement.

Main Results:

Reversing the comparison direction altered judgments, making less representative sequences appear more probable.
These effects persisted even when representativeness cues were removed.
Participants strategically placed more common sequences as referents in the inverted problem.

Conclusions:

The birth sequence problem may not reflect flawed cognition but rather adaptive inference of linguistic cues.
People pragmatically extract meaning from the direction of comparison to infer relative prevalence.
This highlights the human ability to leverage subtle contextual information beyond literal content.