Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

12:12
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
10.7K
Distractor ignoring is as effective as target enhancement when incidentally learned but not when explicitly cued
Douglas A Addleman1, Viola S Störmer2
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. daddleman@dartmouth.edu.
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|October 13, 2022
Summary
Learned attention can equally improve target selection and distractor ignoring. However, voluntary attention shows a greater benefit for target selection than distractor ignoring, suggesting distinct attentional mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Visual Perception
Background:
- Explicit knowledge of target or distractor features enhances visual search performance.
- Previous research indicates explicit distractor cues yield smaller benefits than target cues, suggesting less effective suppression of irrelevant information.
- The asymmetry in performance benefits between target selection and distractor ignoring raises questions about the generalizability of feature-based attention principles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether the asymmetry in attention benefits (target selection vs. distractor ignoring) is a general principle of feature-based attention.
- To compare the efficiency of target selection and distractor ignoring under conditions of incidental learning versus explicit instruction.
- To explore dissociable mechanisms underlying voluntary and incidentally learned attention.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments (N=75 each) involved participants searching for an orientation-defined target among distractors.
- Experiment 1 utilized incidental learning, varying the frequency of target or distractor colors.
- Experiment 2 employed explicit cues for target or distractor colors to induce voluntary attention.
- Response times were measured to assess performance benefits.
Main Results:
- Incidental learning led to comparable benefits for attending towards targets and away from distractors, suggesting equal effectiveness in learned target selection and distractor ignoring.
- Explicit cues for voluntary attention benefited both target selection and distractor ignoring, but distractor cues were significantly less effective than target cues.
- Cross-experiment analyses confirmed that the relative inefficiency of distractor ignoring compared to target selection is specific to voluntary attention.
Conclusions:
- The observed asymmetry in performance benefits between target selection and distractor ignoring is a characteristic of voluntary attention, not incidentally learned attention.
- Learned attention mechanisms can support equally effective target selection and distractor ignoring.
- Distinct neural mechanisms underlie voluntary and learned attention, particularly concerning distractor suppression.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Learning
480
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
480
Interference and Decay
191
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
191
Purposive Learning
183
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
183

