[Translated article] Clinical validity of the intraoperative histology in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection
M R Fernández-Hijano1, J M Gómez-Palomo2, I Arranz-Salas3
1Unidad de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
Background And Aim:
Different authors have demonstrated the usefulness of the histological analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection; however, its clinical validity is still controversial. The aim of this article is to describe and analyse the clinical validity of histological analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic infection in patients undergoing hip or knee prosthetic replacement.
Material And Methods:
We present a retrospective study including 133 hip and knee prosthetic replacements performed in our centre between 2008 and 2020. A descriptive, bivariate statistical analysis was performed and the clinical validity of the histological analysis was determined.
Outcomes:
The clinical validity of the intraoperative histology offered a sensitivity of 48%, a specificity of 91%, a positive predictive value of 55% and a negative predictive value of 88%.
Conclusions:
The determination of the clinical validity of histological analysis shows a high specificity. This analysis is an appropriate diagnostic tool for detecting healthy patients, with no infection.
