Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

07:45
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020
4.5K
Augmenting Kalman Filter Machine Learning Models with Data from OCT to Predict Future Visual Field Loss: An Analysis
Mohammad Zhalechian1, Mark P Van Oyen1, Mariel S Lavieri1
1Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan College of Engineering, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ophthalmology Science
|October 17, 2022
Summary
Machine learning models using Kalman filtering (KF) showed improved glaucoma prediction accuracy when training and testing data racial compositions were aligned. Adding retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) data offered minimal predictive enhancement for glaucoma forecasting.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Medical Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Glaucoma diagnosis and progression monitoring rely on visual field perimetry and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements.
- Machine learning (ML) models, including Kalman filters (KF), are being explored to predict glaucoma progression.
- The influence of demographic factors, such as race, on ML model performance requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if incorporating global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) data enhances the predictive accuracy of Kalman filter (KF) models for glaucoma progression.
- To determine the impact of racial composition in training and testing datasets on the performance of KF models for glaucoma prediction.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective longitudinal cohort study was conducted using data from patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or glaucoma suspects.
- Two KF models were developed: KF-TP (tonometry and perimetry) and KF-TPO (tonometry, perimetry, and global RNFL data).
- These KF models were compared against linear regression (LR) models for predicting 36-month changes in mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation, also assessing performance based on racial alignment of training and testing sets.
Main Results:
- KF models demonstrated higher predictive accuracy (73.5% for KF-TP, 71.2% for KF-TPO) compared to LR models (57.5%, 58.0%) for patients with OAG.
- The addition of global RNFL data (KF-TPO vs. KF-TP) did not significantly improve predictive accuracy (P=0.20).
- Aligning the race of training and testing sets improved mean absolute prediction error by 0.39 dB for KF-TP and 0.48 dB for KF-TPO.
Conclusions:
- Kalman filter models show promise for predicting glaucoma progression, outperforming linear regression models.
- Incorporating global RNFL data offers marginal benefits to KF model predictive accuracy in this cohort.
- Optimizing ML model performance for glaucoma prediction necessitates careful consideration of racial diversity in training and testing datasets.
Keywords:
AD, African descentADAGES, African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation StudyAlgorithm biasCI, confidence intervalD, diopterDIGS, Diagnostic Innovation in Glaucoma StudyED, European descentGlaucomaIOP, intraocular pressureKF, Kalman filterKF-TP, Kalman filter with tonometry and perimetry dataKF-TPO, Kalman filter with tonometry, perimetry, and global retinal nerve fiber layer dataKalman filterLR1, linear regression model 1LR2, linear regression model 2MAE, mean absolute errorMD, mean deviationMachine learningOAG, open-angle glaucomaOCTPSD, pattern standard deviationRMSE, root mean square errorRNFL, retinal nerve fiber layerSD, standard deviationVF, visual field
