Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Innovative Cancer Therapies with Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Treatment
Published on: September 27, 2024
Angiogenesis and Its Targeting in Glioblastoma with Focus on Clinical Approaches
Fatemeh Daneshimehr1, Zahra Barabadi2, Shahrokh Abdolahi1
1Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:
Angiogenesis is a characteristic of glioblastoma (GBM), the most fatal and therapeutic-resistant brain tumor. Highly expressed angiogenic cytokines and proliferated microvascular system made anti-angiogenesis treatments a thoroughly plausible approach for GBM treatment. Many trials have proved to be not only as a safe but also as an effective approach in GBM retardation in a certain time window as seen in radiographic response rates; however, they have failed to implement significant improvements in clinical manifestation whether alone or in combination with radio/chemotherapy. Bevasizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) antibody, is the only agent that exerts meaningful clinical influence by improving progression-free survival (PFS) and partially alleviate clinical symptoms, nevertheless, it could not prolong the overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM. The data generated from phase II trials clearly revealed a correlation between elevated reperfusion, subsequent to vascular normalization induction, and improved clinical outcomes which explicitly indicates anti-angiogenesis treatments are beneficial. In order to prolong these initial benefits observed in a certain period of time after anti-angiogenesis targeting, some aspects of the therapy should be tackled: recognition of other bypass angiogenesis pathways activated following antiangiogenesis therapy, identification of probable pathways that induce insensitivity to shortage of blood supply, and classifying the patients by mapping their GBM-related gene profile as biomarkers to predict their responsiveness to therapy. Herein, the molecular basis of brain vasculature development in normal and tumoral conditions is briefly discussed and it is explained how "vascular normalization" concept opened a window to a better comprehension of some adverse effects observed in anti-angiogenesis therapy in clinical condition. Then, the most targeted angiogenesis pathways focused on ligand/receptor interactions in GBM clinical trials are reviewed. Lastly, different targeting strategies applied in anti-angiogenesis treatment are discussed.
Insights
Anti-angiogenesis therapy shows promise for glioblastoma (GBM) by improving progression-free survival, but fails to extend overall survival. Future strategies must address resistance mechanisms and identify patient biomarkers for sustained clinical benefit.
Area of Science:
- Neuro-oncology
- Cancer biology
- Vascular biology
Background:
- Glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by significant angiogenesis, making anti-angiogenesis a plausible therapeutic strategy.
- Current anti-angiogenesis treatments, including Bevasizumab (anti-VEGF-A), offer limited clinical benefit, primarily improving progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS).
- Observed radiographic responses and improved outcomes with vascular normalization suggest the underlying principle of anti-angiogenesis is beneficial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the molecular basis of angiogenesis in normal and GBM conditions.
- To discuss the concept of 'vascular normalization' and its implications for adverse effects.
- To examine targeted angiogenesis pathways and strategies used in GBM clinical trials.
Main Methods:
- Review of molecular mechanisms of brain vasculature development.
- Analysis of clinical trial data on anti-angiogenesis therapies for GBM.
- Discussion of ligand/receptor interactions in targeted angiogenesis pathways.
- Evaluation of different anti-angiogenesis targeting strategies.
Main Results:
- Anti-angiogenesis therapy can induce vascular normalization and reperfusion, correlating with improved clinical outcomes in GBM.
- Bevasizumab demonstrates efficacy in improving PFS and alleviating symptoms but does not prolong OS.
- Resistance to anti-angiogenesis therapy can arise from bypass angiogenesis pathways and insensitivity to blood supply deprivation.
Conclusions:
- Anti-angiogenesis is a valid approach for GBM, but its clinical benefits are limited by resistance mechanisms.
- Future research should focus on identifying bypass pathways, understanding resistance, and using gene profiling for patient stratification.
- Optimizing anti-angiogenesis therapy requires a deeper understanding of its molecular underpinnings and personalized treatment approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Mechanism of Angiogenesis

