Angiogenesis and Its Targeting in Glioblastoma with Focus on Clinical Approaches

Fatemeh Daneshimehr1, Zahra Barabadi2, Shahrokh Abdolahi1

  • 1Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Cell Journal
|October 19, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Anti-angiogenesis therapy shows promise for glioblastoma (GBM) by improving progression-free survival, but fails to extend overall survival. Future strategies must address resistance mechanisms and identify patient biomarkers for sustained clinical benefit.

Area of Science:

  • Neuro-oncology
  • Cancer biology
  • Vascular biology

Background:

  • Glioblastoma (GBM) is characterized by significant angiogenesis, making anti-angiogenesis a plausible therapeutic strategy.
  • Current anti-angiogenesis treatments, including Bevasizumab (anti-VEGF-A), offer limited clinical benefit, primarily improving progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS).
  • Observed radiographic responses and improved outcomes with vascular normalization suggest the underlying principle of anti-angiogenesis is beneficial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the molecular basis of angiogenesis in normal and GBM conditions.
  • To discuss the concept of 'vascular normalization' and its implications for adverse effects.
  • To examine targeted angiogenesis pathways and strategies used in GBM clinical trials.

Main Methods:

  • Review of molecular mechanisms of brain vasculature development.
  • Analysis of clinical trial data on anti-angiogenesis therapies for GBM.
  • Discussion of ligand/receptor interactions in targeted angiogenesis pathways.
  • Evaluation of different anti-angiogenesis targeting strategies.

Main Results:

  • Anti-angiogenesis therapy can induce vascular normalization and reperfusion, correlating with improved clinical outcomes in GBM.
  • Bevasizumab demonstrates efficacy in improving PFS and alleviating symptoms but does not prolong OS.
  • Resistance to anti-angiogenesis therapy can arise from bypass angiogenesis pathways and insensitivity to blood supply deprivation.

Conclusions:

  • Anti-angiogenesis is a valid approach for GBM, but its clinical benefits are limited by resistance mechanisms.
  • Future research should focus on identifying bypass pathways, understanding resistance, and using gene profiling for patient stratification.
  • Optimizing anti-angiogenesis therapy requires a deeper understanding of its molecular underpinnings and personalized treatment approaches.