Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.1K

Peer Reviewing Papers for a Nursing Journal.

Charon A Pierson1

  • 1Charon A. Pierson is a consultant and freelance editor from Manchester, CT. She is the former editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners . Contact author: charon.pierson@gmail.com . The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

The American Journal of Nursing
|October 20, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Twenty-eight years of experience measuring autonomy using the Dempster Practice Behavior Scale.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2020
Same author

Keywords matter: A critical factor in getting published work discovered.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

The vocabulary of science.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

Looking forward to better weather and cake.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

Retractions in nursing literature: Responsibilities of nurse authors, reviewers, and editors.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same author

Peer review and journal quality.

Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners·2018
Same journal

Sleep Worry Among Clinical Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The American journal of nursing·2026
Same journal

Implementing an Alternative Patient Care Technician Staffing Model on a Medical Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study.

The American journal of nursing·2026
Same journal

In the Gray: What's a Nurse to Do?

The American journal of nursing·2026
Same journal

Enhancing the Professional Work Environment Through Nursing Engagement in an Academic Medical Center.

The American journal of nursing·2026
Same journal

The Nursing the Revolution Exhibit.

The American journal of nursing·2026
Same journal

Code Prep Choreography: Navigating the Urgent Interval.

The American journal of nursing·2026
See all related articles

Peer reviewers are crucial for manuscript decisions. This guide outlines key considerations for accepting review invitations and essential components for a constructive peer review report.

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Manuscript Review Process

Background:

  • Manuscript evaluation relies heavily on peer reviewer feedback.
  • Effective peer review is essential for maintaining scientific integrity and advancing research dissemination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To guide peer reviewers on accepting assignments.
  • To detail the critical elements of a comprehensive peer review.

Main Methods:

  • This article provides a descriptive overview of best practices for peer reviewers.
  • It synthesizes expert recommendations for manuscript evaluation.

Main Results:

  • Reviewers should assess their expertise and workload before accepting a review.
  • A thorough peer review report should include constructive criticism and highlight manuscript strengths and weaknesses.

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

12.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 24, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.1K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.8K
Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults
08:47

Oral Health Assessment by Lay Personnel for Older Adults

Published on: February 2, 2020

12.9K

Conclusions:

  • Adhering to these guidelines enhances the quality of peer review.
  • This supports editors in making informed decisions and improves scientific literature.